T61 Bolt on Turbo by Cx Racing
- Thread starter Steve_N
- Start date
IJ.;1468008 said:
indeed it does
someone T-boned my daily driver so im driving my supra to work for a bit till i can find a new car, running 5-6psi which suits me for the moment, no signs of the turbo going bad as of yet i've put over 1000km on it since installation. i don't expect much to happen till after Christmas
IJ.;1468008 said:
x2. I took off my MBC (not sure if its gonna help as much) but it takes a lot longer to fully spool my ct-26. Ill get 10lbs low, but now it just keeps creeping up towards 14-15lbs without the MBC on. Its all good though cause my MBC leaked a ton of air (Not sure if it was a bleeder style) but it was just giving me problems.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/T76-...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories?hash=item27ad603120 <---- this is the turbo im gunna do for my NA/T build 
i will definitely get back to you guys if this issue isnt resolved. it seems like these guys are reputable on paper.
i will definitely get back to you guys if this issue isnt resolved. it seems like these guys are reputable on paper.
speedgilligan;1473281 said:
That maybe so but agian that turbo has nothing to do with this thread hence the title. The company has already been looked upon in this thread and so far no complaints. As far as your link in this thread it is totally off topic to the discussion of the bolt on turbo everyone has been talking about in this thread specificly. Not trying to come off as an a$$ in anyway please dont take it that way. Just hoping the thread will stay and topic.
Agreed. This thread is about a bolt on turbo which makes a big difference. All you can relay to us is whether it lasts or not
7Matt-GE;1472694 said:http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/T76-...r_Truck_Parts_Accessories?hash=item27ad603120 <---- this is the turbo im gunna do for my NA/T build
:3d_frown:
Anything new with the turbo?
carter;1474037 said:
i've put 1500km on it so far, but i'm running 5psi until i fit my new engine management, seems very happy doing what its doing, i cranked the gain all the way up and it spools nicely now any higher than 5psi on a cold night will trigger fuel cut. however on a warm day i can run 7psi. must be something to do with the density of the air.
So the bottom line, if you run this on a stock ecu/afm @psi you will hit fuel cut.
When are you looking to do the engine management? How does it pull compared to the ct26 at 5-7psi?
bountykilla0118;1476069 said:
when i can get some cash together to get a new daily.
the ct spools much earlier so the ct feels much quicker in 1st and under 3500rpm in other gears, its slowish from 0-50km/h but quick from 50-100km/h onwards (peak power feels round 5800rpm @ 6psi in 2nd/3rd)
once this turbo gets to full boost it pulls quite hard (and so it should being much larger) i've got a front mount and i'm running 100ron
all in all i think its best to wait till i can get it tuned on the dyno and ramped up to 18psi where its efficient then compare the actual dyno graph rather than my personal experience as i haven't tested other turbo's of similar size except a 57trim,
87witmoreboost;1478216 said:
Can you shed a little light of understanding so I can see what the difference is please .....
***Correction after a quick search I found the answer
Volume is one of the parameters for density, the other being mass. Volume measures how much space a substance occupies. Mass measures the amount of matter in the substance. Density then shows the amount of matter in a given space for a substance.
IJ.;1476906 said:
never seen 93 before, we only have 91,95 (lead replacement), 98 and 100 (with ethanol) and there is some E85 sold
i went up to my parents house in the bush through some mountains and windy roads with generous speed limits , at the end of a 5 minute drive up a steep hill on boost i pulled over and the turbo was glowing and i'm not even running high boost. on my car it seems to be pretty useless under 50km/h but goes well in the higher rpm range