7M Block is better than 2JZ Block

Status
Not open for further replies.

p5150

ASE and FAA A&P Certified
Mar 31, 2005
1,176
0
36
Central Idaho
89supturbo said:
No, its not the number on the engine that makes it more powerful or gives it more potential but theres a reason they dont just stamp the word engine on every block produced. the number of cylinders doesnt matter at all, displacement of all the cylinders combined does, and in the world of fcar we refer to volumetric efficiency of an engine as a whole flow is for things like heads which will improve the VE, also valve timing is part of volumetric efficiency. that being said the important factors are displacement, and volumetric efficiency, the 7m and 2j have almost equal displacement but the 2j has better volumetric efficiency. You even listed other downfalls of the 7m, oiling issues most importantly that will destroy a motor in short order, and just one final ponit before you try to act smart remember in any automotive disscusion only one thing matters, whos got the ASE certs and who needs to shut up

Well said, 89supturbo. Many people buy rods, pistons, 1mm bigger valves (2jz valves are 1.5mm bigger than 7m valves), and all this extra crap for the 7m just to make it as durable as the STOCK 2JZ. Dee de Dee. Trust me, I was once the Dee de Dee. No longer.

Why not just buy a used 2jz for about $500+shipping and be done with it? If it is in bad condition then you got ripped off and you need to address it.
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
p5150 said:
Since when can you take a stock 7m with a mhg and generate 600 hp reliably?

quite easily actually.

again, user error (which all rod knocks issues are regardless of what you think or who you would like to blame) takes care of 99% of all 7m's.

btw see my replies to you "statements" in that other engine thread.
 

89supturbo

New Member
Jul 28, 2006
186
0
0
Delmar, NY
figgie said:
quite easily actually.

again, user error (which all rod knocks issues are regardless of what you think or who you would like to blame) takes care of 99% of all 7m's.

btw see my replies to you "statements" in that other engine thread.

there is no user error if the bottom end is completely untouched which can be done on a 2j I dont believe i have to cite specific cases but i will if you insist, however i would like to see one of these 7m's that makes 600hp on the stock shortblock if you wouldnt mind posting a link
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
89supturbo said:
there is no user error if the bottom end is completely untouched which can be done on a 2j I dont believe i have to cite specific cases but i will if you insist, however i would like to see one of these 7m's that makes 600hp on the stock shortblock if you wouldnt mind posting a link

Rod Knock is in fact user stupidity (error is not harsh enough)

See the nice thing about oil. You don't have to TOUCH the motor or take it apart, there is a handy dandy thing Toyota included in all engines that checks the level of the oil is at the optimum point.

Of course the ignorant user ASSUMES it just there to look pretty and add color to the engine bay Unfortunatly, If it is low on oil, it is no ones fault but the owner ;) See part of that upkeep that you must endure when you own a car ;)

as for stock....

not 600hp

598hp ;)

http://www.7mpower.com/orian_iglesias.shtml


here is trent that no longer is in the game.. he had more power than that before he sold the car two years ago.

http://www.7mpower.com/orian_iglesias.shtml


and there have been manyother guys that have since pulled off the site (anyone remember melloYello in the Yellow Toilet? :) ) at thier own request.

Prof Figgie
standing against the wave of stupidity and dispelling myth's since 1994.

this class has been dismissed but please by all means, continue grabbing at straws. :)
 
Last edited:

p5150

ASE and FAA A&P Certified
Mar 31, 2005
1,176
0
36
Central Idaho
figgie said:
actually statistically challeneged.

that is within the 1% - 2% deviation of all dyno's ;)

so technically it is ;)

so as with your arguments so far. You LOSE.

Actually, YOU LOSE. Both dyno sheets on that link say 520 hp. AND here is the paragraph later on in the text for those that can READ:


08/10/04 - Update!
The stock motor lasted about 3 months at such extreme power levels. Eventually the motor succumbed to rod knock and blown rings. The new setup includes a .020 over block with no oil squirters, Ross pistons and rings, TMS headgasket, Cleavite 77 main bearings, and Pauter rods.


HAHA LOL :word8kn: :eek:wned:
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
p5150 said:
Actually, YOU LOSE. Both dyno sheets on that link say 520 hp. AND here is the paragraph later on in the text for those that can READ:





HAHA LOL :word8kn: :eek:wned:


psst

there is that Rod knock thing , you know, the part that is the lack of oil part like in your case. ;)

so genews 520 rwhp equals how much crank?

ooh wait you guys didn't say which one..... ;)
 

p5150

ASE and FAA A&P Certified
Mar 31, 2005
1,176
0
36
Central Idaho
figgie said:
psst

there is that Rod knock thing , you know, the part that is the lack of oil part like in your case. ;)

so genews 520 rwhp equals how much crank?

ooh wait you guys didn't say which one..... ;)

DUDE YOU ARE GAY
 

89supturbo

New Member
Jul 28, 2006
186
0
0
Delmar, NY
I'm still not cryin, and i go by whp numbers because the engine was never dyno'd by itself and i still contend 598 is not 600 and 520 isn't close
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
89supturbo said:
I'm still not cryin, and i go by whp numbers because the engine was never dyno'd by itself and i still contend 598 is not 600 and 520 isn't close

ahh so after the fact you disclose how you wanted the power........
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
Last of the JZ motors ended production in the IS300 etc. (Lexus used it in two cars at the end, no use by Toyota at all after the Supra ended production in 98 officially in the USA.)

My brother's IS300 has the last version with the VVTi and it's a sweet motor to be sure.

You can find low mileage used JZ motors from these lexus vehicles that have never been modded, or hotrodded and are in excellent shape.

With some simple mods, those same used motors are very capable of 600+ at the wheels.

I think there are very few, if any 7MGTE's out there anymore capable of making 600hp for very long on stock internals. They are just too old, and worn out.

With the right mods, the 7M is a great builder engine. Reality is with similar mods, the JZ motors are just as responsive to the upgrades, and as we all know, Toyota designed out many of the compromises the 7M has built into it.

1) It was originally designed for a distributor located on the left side of the block. (not the head as is used later on the 7MGE version.) Your drain tube on the block that the intake cam cover dumps into? That's the hole where the distributor used to reside.
2) That distributor also was run off a shaft that drives the oil pump. There was a mechanical fuel pump located there too. (The J tube cover is where the pump was located, and there is a uncut mass of material where the lobe for that pump would be machined on the oil pump drive. There is also a disk of material that gear teeth would be cut to run the distributor as well.)
3) The crossover oil pump design sucks balls. (To get around it, you have to at least change how the oil exits the block, or go all the way and upgrade the way it leaves the pump too.)
4) Oil pickup design sucks. Pan design sucks. Both are resolved with some simple mods, but the basic setup has many flaws, and I'd wager the bulk of rock knock problems started with downshifting while under heavy braking.. the oil sloshes to the front of the pan/engine and uncovers the pickup, yet the engine is running at high rpm.. and there goes your rod bearings.

Things like the head design are the reality of the era they were designed for. In the early 80's, 200NA horsepower was very stout for a 3.0 I6. For the later JZ engine, 225 was considered OK. That 25hp difference played out in the turbo models too, 230hp v/s 320hp... stock rated of course, but everyone knows the rating on the last Supra was low on purpose.

But let's not split hairs. The new engine designs from Toyota exceed the JZ motors, and they should. They are new!

That being said, anytime you can get more displacment in a motor that is about the same size and weight of another is a good thing.

The best combination of price, size and weight is the aluminum V8 LS3 engines from GM right now. They are plentiful, cheap to mod and make insane power when under forced induction. (They flow great NA, and under pressure they make the most of just having two valves per cyc.)

I've done some measurements, and using the bell housing to adapt the R154 to the Holden V8 (AKA, LS3) this engine would be lower, and further back than the stock I6. It would be about the same over all weight when turbo charged with two turbo's. (Imagine twin GT35's on there... fast spool and oh, an easy 1200hp at the wheels.. from a 7L engine.)

Setting the engine back like this makes more room to run a larger FMIC and radiator etc. (Heck, the PWR or CSF dual core alloy radiators would work fine I'd think to cool this motor.) Keep your AC too. Or even better, bolt it all up to a new 5 speed auto, and get awesome gas mileage, and never have to shift again. Easy? Nope, but nothing is easy.

Would this piss off the "faithfull" MK3 owner? Yep, but the nice part is you just push more on the gas, and very soon you will not be able to hear them bitch anymore, as they will be too far behind you to hear, even with bullhorns!

Keep in mind, I have spent more on my stroker 7MGTE than it would cost to build a very nice GM V8 TT engine... so flame away!

I like the 7M, but I'm not married to it gentlemen. If there is a next time around on this motor, I'd go JZ if easy, or even better, I'll go LS3 based and really make some insane power to test the brakes on. :)
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
Adjuster said:
Keep in mind, I have spent more on my stroker 7MGTE than it would cost to build a very nice GM V8 TT engine... so flame away!

I like the 7M, but I'm not married to it gentlemen. If there is a next time around on this motor, I'd go JZ if easy, or even better, I'll go LS3 based and really make some insane power to test the brakes on. :)

I did mention the $300 dollar junkyard project from hotrod but just like I anticipated and right on queue, the response came in as "what does that have to do with anything, 2jz for $400!!!" yada yada.

Blindness or just a choice not to listen.

Hell I agree with you holeheartdly on the stroker thing, looking back. biggest V8 I could afford regardless if it is Toyota, Chevy, Ford etc, twin turbo the sucker, call it a day. "potential" power, cubic inches always wins. I wonder if there is enough room to shoe horn a viper v10 under there... starts pondering. lol
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
Viper V10 will fit, but it's not a super performance motor. (Look at the 06 Z06 motor, 7.0L and V8 based on the LS3 design, Ti rods and other tricks, and 505hp out of the box. (And GM is rating this motor slightly low, there are copies of this engine out there making more power by quite a bit than rate power.)

I have a subscription to Hot Rod, Modified and Car & Driver, but I also read most of the other car mags from time to time. (Used to sub to Turbo, but they SUCK anymore, so I do not bother to read them anymore. If you want to read Turbo mag, just read SCC, and it's the same content.)

The SBC is alive and well, and there are many other engines out there that intrest me. (For example, can you imagine a V12 twin turbo diesel in the Supra? That would be the tourqe monster from hell, and it would be fun to drive for sure. Audi has some V12's out there that are very intersting, but most of the cool diesels are in Europe.)

This past SILV my car was not done, so I drove my 98 A8. It has the 4.2L V8 prior to the 5 valve head, and it's only rated at 300hp. This car is wicked fast for a large family sedan, and it had no problems keeping up with two modified MK4's that I caravaned down with. (After the first few passes and 100 to 140mph runs, we stopped for construction work, and they both wanted to know what was under the hood on this thing :) LOL) And this is the base model of this car... :) I'm either going to get a S8 or RS6 one of these days, and they both make more power. (The S8 is 360 and the RS6 is 450, but the new S8 and S6 with the Lambo V10 are 400 and 450 IIRC.) In any case, for the daily drive, you need to keep your eyes peeled for large German sedans with the bigger motors. They are dang fast. (And so are the new V8 powered Cadillacs, that STSV is a rocket,)

Ok, back on point. Engines are always going to be better when they are re-designed or refined in anyway. (I've re-designed and refined the 7M in my own way to the point where I'm not sure there is anything else worth doing.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.