Search results

HKS VPC + HKS FCON + HKS GCC was the package. GCC was the "tuner".

argument? There is no "argument". Physics are on my side plain and simple. They lifted can be anything, from incorrect suspension settings to to LIGHT a wheel tire combo upfront, to not slipping the clutch enough. Eddie Bello used to run two sets depending on track conditions...

umm I know that you are not running the stock TCCS without a TPS that has a IDL switch or one that been rigged to act like an IDL switch. Right?? Complicating thing more than they need be. What year is the ecu of the car?

hmm ever heard of the fuel resistor by pass mod? It is to make the fuel pump work at 100% all the time. Sarch for it and try it and see if the "lean out" goes away.

well I have one but it is going to be time consuming. In the engine bay. You have a fuse box that is close to the battery. You will have to disassemble that fuse box and look at the wires and particularly a ground wire.

well before blaming the electronics... what happens when you turn the S-AFC off? Have you checked that the TPS is adjusted correctly?

it is. If they would go to a solid axel they would pick up time. btw. Vinnie ten in his early blue supra was running a solid axel in the back for quite some time. Was doing quick times with less power ;)

with close to 1600 hp. I sure as hell, hope not. It one of those simple physics things and nothing more. More moving part = more energy loss. There is no way around it.

The stock one is not acurate? Please explain (and notice who is asking that question!).

actually no. There is a reason it take all that power to get them that low. A solid rear axel car would be sunk in the 10's with 600 rwhp. IRS are great for road racing but they have way to many moving parts where precious energy is lost in the form of flexing.

sorry lack of puter at home =( too complicated. the stock tcss already does that based on rpm. you can add your pressure switch and that should work.

Done? That a mythical word! Shhh You are going to jinx the kid ;)

question is unanswerable. power at a certain pressure does not exist. Turbo's flow, as is evident in any flow charts from Garret/Honeywell, Holset etc. that parts list looks fine save for piggy back for that power level. I suggest you read this...

30 amps max.. Relying on two mosfets. Here is my concerns with that. If one mosfet goes, the other one cascades in a death of firey glory. Yes FIRE. I have never been a fan of parallel mosfets unless a fail safe is built in that cuts the power if one of the FETs fail. Now with that one, you...

how exactly are you tuning? I don't see a piggy back of any sort (still). You are not going to clean that up by screw alone.

the first link i posted.. The PWM output Duty Cycle is based on input voltage which happens to be controlled by a rheostat. :) A diode inline to numerous inputs with diff resistors will also accomplish that ;)...

It can actually but the BAP will complicate matters. the diagram attached is for PWM the fuel pump instead of using inline resistor as stock and controlled by the TCCS. Does not go above 13.8v. The PWM circuit can be purchased or built. picture attached ;) if using a BAP. I would...

jdub right on the money :) the only thing I might do different is run the KB BAP 16v full time and PWM that. Takes the Enable circuit out and just PWM more duty cycle range. "picture" of his circuit. Forgive the crudeness of it. I only have visio at work :(

jdub no problem :) let me show you how I learned :) http://www.cpemma.co.uk/pwm.html That site is where I got my PWM circuit from. Also has the much needed pictures. The PWM Circuit I myself use for Fuel, LED dimming etc is this one http://www.cpemma.co.uk/pwm_erg.html...

I don't. :) Why? CASH COW for the Socialist Republik of Kommieformia. Plain and simple. ;)