Basically, i wanted a setup where the weight of the turbo was not supported by the manifold itself. As you guys know, turbos are not light, especially ones of this size...lol. The primary lengths will only be a couple inches longer than the Ron R maniold i had, and ill be honest, I'm not the type of guy thats gonna pull out my calculator and physics book to set the optimal primary length. The way i see it is most turbo headers go down off the head and loop back up to the turbo....these will just shoot forward instead of up. I also wanted to keep the charge piping fairly short. In this case, it will make a 90 to the drivers side, then a 90 back towards the TB. Are 90's optimal? Of course not. but the way i see it, most setups have 3 or 4 90s in their system along with a big-honkin IC to assist in pressure drop. The turbo inlet, liek you said dave, will probably be routed to the drivers side for a gradual bend. I knwo youre not flaming, and maybe it might be slightly more complicated than it needs to be, but im just tryign to think of whats gonna be the most effective, and still give me longevity/reliability.
SySt, yes the mounts are solid, and i will also fab up a strut with heim joints, (much like a 4-link bar) that will go from the frame to the motor to obviously help with keeping it in one place. And i gotta admit, "but by not using the intercooler you are not flowing as much air into the engine" kinda puzzled me. How does the IC flow more air into the engine? Did i read into it wrong? Even still, i dont think an IC is necessary, and if my IAT decides to tell me other wise, i will spritz soma alky in the charge pipe to help out. Again, ideal? maybe not. Effective, i sure think so.
Keep in mind, im not flaming back or insinuating an arguement....just bouncing back whats going on in my warped skull, im sure many might agree with you more than me. Wouldnt be the first time...lol.