Is the GT3540R turbo worth the money?

gilberjj

Friend of Fast
Apr 14, 2006
661
0
0
Tacoma, WA
Poodles said:
new ZO6 is the biggest steal in the performance car market, PERIOD.

nothing beats it in handling, braking, power, ect for it's price...

I put that in comment in quites as that's usually the way I hear about the new LSX engines. But to be honest, it would probably be even MORE powerful and with a broader torque curve with a DOHC setup with VVT...

yes, you are right about more power and having a broader torque curve, but it would no longer be "the biggest steal in the performance car market, PERIOD."
 

Poodles

I play with fire
Jul 22, 2006
16,757
0
0
43
Fort Worth, TX
probably would be since the new ZO6 motor is hand built anyway...

keep in mind there is next to nothing in common with the LSX series of engine and the old SBC's...
 

suprabad

Coitus Non Circum
Jul 12, 2005
1,796
0
0
Down Like A Clown Charley Brown
nosechunks said:
i wonder how much better designed the cylinder heads are on those bmw's. reminds me of why you can run 10psi with 10.5:1 compression in an ls1 but anything else would go boom.

somehow i think if 500 horsepower was easy on pump with a 35r we would know about it by now.

7m heads are not too bad (valves are spaced at a performance-oriented 50° angle, and they flow pretty good out of the box, much better with a little grinding and polishing). Nothing to be ashamed of.

10psi at 10.5:1? Na-t guys do it all the time (or at least close).

9.1:1 stock compression and a bunch shaved off the head (usually out of necessity rather then design). It might not add up to quite 10.5:1 but it's close! And running alot more boost than 10psi.

It's all about the tune...and in particular getting the timing backed-off just enough at max boost, or yeah, you'll go kaboom.
 

TurboStreetCar

Formerly Nosechunks
Feb 25, 2006
2,777
6
38
Long Island, Ny
suprabad said:
7m heads are not too bad (valves are spaced at a performance-oriented 50° angle, and they flow pretty good out of the box, much better with a little grinding and polishing). Nothing to be ashamed of.

10psi at 10.5:1? Na-t guys do it all the time (or at least close).

9.1:1 stock compression and a bunch shaved off the head (usually out of necessity rather then design). It might not add up to quite 10.5:1 but it's close! And running alot more boost than 10psi.

It's all about the tune...and in particular getting the timing backed-off just enough at max boost, or yeah, you'll go kaboom.

i really don't think milling the head and block for a metal head gasket will up the compression 1.5 points. unless the head/block was REALLY out of wack. or else turbo guys rebuilding would need to find pistons that are 7:1 as drop-ins. don't forget metal head gaskets are thicker then stock fiber ones. sometimes the compression is actually dropped because of this.

id say 9.5 with normal amount of material removed and a very thin head gasket TOPS. also superchargers heat air more then turbos, and roots style dont have much room for intercooling besides a small heat exchanger and thats what they run on stock 10.5:1 ls1's
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
Back on the topic.. I was doing sme more reading about the GT35 on Honda-Tech. Its just hear-say,but the big name tuners are saying that the GT35 turbine wheel flows just as well as the bigger P-trim turbine turbine wheel.

P-trim turbine wheel size: inducer-2.54" exducer-2.92"
GT35 turbine wheel size: inducer-2.45" exducer- 2.68"

I'm sure the old P-trim is much heavier.
 

gilberjj

Friend of Fast
Apr 14, 2006
661
0
0
Tacoma, WA
the new bullseye turbos have some great looking compressor maps, and i wish they would incorporate the variable vane technology (i think thats what they call it) in an aftermarket turbo. Like the turbos in the new 911's
 

TurboStreetCar

Formerly Nosechunks
Feb 25, 2006
2,777
6
38
Long Island, Ny
to costly, the parts to make it then the system to control it would drive the cost of the turbo up to high. it would be nice to have though.

how about the new gt4094R? anyone look into that thing?
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
DrJones, did you drive with your GT35 enough to determine how it spooled compared to your SP57? I remember the spool on that SP57 with its .58A/R was outstanding. Were you using the .82 A/R on the GT35?

Any other owners want to commment on spool-up? I remember my SP61GT hitting 15psi in 4th gear at 3300rpm's. Any one try that with the GT35?? I was very satisified how the SP61GT turbo spooled with the stock manifold.
 

drjonez

Supramania Contributor
Mar 31, 2005
3,061
0
0
18
the motor city
www.4cefed.com
MRSUPRA said:
DrJones, did you drive with your GT35 enough to determine how it spooled compared to your SP57? I remember the spool on that SP57 with its .58A/R was outstanding. Were you using the .82 A/R on the GT35?...

nope, i never had the chance. :3d_frown:

yup, i had the ATP .82 turbine housing....actually, i still have it if anyone wants it...ceramic coated too!
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
Ok, I tried it on my car.. Here we go, hold on.. 0psi at 1700rpm's in 4th. 1psi at 2100 rpm's. At least that's what my boost gauge read.

That's on an SP59GT with a .68A/R using the HPF manifold
 

TurboStreetCar

Formerly Nosechunks
Feb 25, 2006
2,777
6
38
Long Island, Ny
how much? looks like it could be the next step upgrade for anyone not happy with the power from a 35R. spool of a 4088 with flow of a gt42 sounds pretty good.