92nsx's supra build

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
Nope I still being a lazy ass on that stupid code. But I did get my rg 59 cable down, and Drew is going to drop off some of the shielded wire from his old band setup. Also I talked with kelly ( he broke one of his knock sensors when removing the starter ) and he can get new ones for $30 ea. So I might also pick up some new ones also.
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
funky_monkey58;1295729 said:
Looking good Rob, ever fix the code 52?


As of today I can say YES.::w00t:: Code 52 is a thing of the past. I finally dug into the wiring and found that knk1 was shorted to ground, meaning that the sheilded wire was touching some some where. So I started to dig in the the front knock sensor and BAM about 4" from the connector I found where.

You can see where the clear jacket has been melted a little and a couple strands were showing. But not any more :)
p1299698_1.jpg


Wow getting rid of the stupid code 52 and getting the TCCS out of limp mode and this car is an entirely different animal ( in a good way) :eek3dance.
 

Mr.Yuk

New Member
Apr 3, 2009
169
0
0
Minnesota
Nice.. All of it. Very nice. Can't wait to check it out without limp-mode problems.
And if for some reason you still need some 1/4 Mono lemme know, braided is gotta be better than solid core.:naughty:
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
Mr.Yuk;1299921 said:
Nice.. All of it. Very nice. Can't wait to check it out without limp-mode problems.
And if for some reason you still need some 1/4 Mono lemme know, braided is gotta be better than solid core.:naughty:

Thank you. Also I wont need any wire since I fixed the OEM sheilded wire and didn't have to replace it.
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
Thank you SupraClaou.

Well Monday night I was leaving a friends house and the clutch was not feeling right. Pressed in the clutch pedal and didnt feel much resistance tell almost the end of the throw. So I make it home with no problems and pop the hood to check the reservoir and it was bone dry :cry: I filled it back up the next morning and was worked just fine again.

I haven't been under the car since then but it dosent look like the hard line is leaking. So I guess it is time to replace or rebuild the slave cly. and maybe pick up a new soft line for the slave also, but we will see.

Also stayed tuned for #'s, there is a local shop that is having a dyno day this up coming Sat. the 25 so I might just cruise down there to see what see is putting down since it is only $50 for 3 pulls :aigo:
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
Yep the #'s are in and not to good, compaired to other members with the 7mgte and the ct 26 set to 11-12 lbs of boost :( If anything the 272 cams are bring down the #'s. But I will keep searching here for more dyno sheets.

Also I think this is the first time 272 cams have been dynoed on a 7mgte and as we can see they didnt help anything out. But I also need some tuning very bad. After 3600-3800 RPMS on the EPA dosent like me any more. It is below 10 on the A/F.

As funky was saying there were also a few fox bodys down there and the one on the dyno before me was around 05 GT with cobra emblems, body kit you know, all the domestic rice. Any ways he only put down something like 180 HP and 230 TQ. But there also was a brand new GT500 in there and hot dam that thing put down like 504 HP & 498 TQ at the wheels.

Any ways on to the pics.

p1304874_1.jpg


p1304874_2.jpg


p1304874_3.jpg


p1304874_4.jpg
 
Last edited:

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
Yep there degreed into the engine by where the cam card said they should be. I had to advance the intake cam around 3 degrees from the OEM spot and the exhaust was retarted about 8 degrees from the OEM spot.

Also looking a couple other dyno sheets posted by other members with the 7m and a ct26 their peek power is before and most around 5K rpms. Where mine is around 5600 rpms, plus I thought that I read that these cams should be reved higher because they make power on the top end. Umm.... Any other ideas you guys have feel free to share. As for electronics I might pick up a piggy back but will probably just wait and just pick a full stand alone later on this year.
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
IJ.;1305029 said:
Might be some power if you open the lobe centres a little.

?? Not sure what you mean, open the lobe centers?

IJ.;1305029 said:
It does seem a bit low for that much boost.

Yep that is the exactley what I thought when I saw the #'s consdering that other members that just crank the ct26 up to 12 lbs & 3" exhaust / DP with no other mods to the motor are getting around 330+ hp and 360+ TQ. Plus I have all the head/valve work besides the lower end built up also.
 

92nsx

Supramania Contributor
Sep 30, 2005
2,957
0
0
Clearwater, MN
^^ Ok I know what you are saying. I know valve overlap is bad on a turbo engine, and right now IIRC there is about 8 degrees were they are overlapping right now according to the cam card.

Here is a pic of the cam card, LMK what you think. advance the intake ____ degrees more, retard the exhaust____degrees more?

p1305059_1.jpg



Also found where the DOT3 from the empty cluch resivor is going.........INSIDE THE CAR!! It is leaking some where and runs down the fire wall on the inside of the car then comes to the carpet to get soaked up :cry:. So I might try to rebuild it or see how much toyota want for a new one.
 
Last edited:

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,224
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
my thoughts

like I told ya before, zero overlap if you can help it. If you have overlap on the intake phase, you will need to see when the intake is opening to the cylinder and adjust that and then finagle the exhaust for the rest.

Now with that said.

Remember you ARE constrained to the stock TCCS and you are also running the stock AFM and INJECTORS. That CT26 is just not benifiting from those monster CAMs. I have a set of stock cam's for your tiny turbo ;) hehehe
 

Zach

ECUMaster USA
Apr 6, 2005
375
0
0
TX
lol, your AFR's are pegged for most of the pull. You'd be amazed what trimming a little fuel can do :)
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,224
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
he has nothing to trim with!! lol.

It is basically the stock TCCS and fuel system. I just think that the TCCS can not compensate for those cam's. It flows well as we can tell by the AFR as the TCCS is thinking it is overboosting hence the stupid rich AFR prior to FC.

Cam's this big on a stock TCCS. No gains or minimal gains. Anyone else running this type of cam's on a stock system?????