Shytheed Dumas said:A fair question, and I will say it for the 10th time tonight.
Say what? You STILL haven't answered the question...
Shytheed Dumas said:You say anything goes as long as it doesn't tread on anybody elses rights. I think the catalyst for the revival of this topic tonight clearly demonstrates that it does negatively affect the rights of innocent people. Are you going to contradict yourself now, or agree that prohibition of drugs that show a serious propensity for abuse should be supported by even you?
There's no contradiction. I support legislation that punishes ACTIONS that infringe on an individuals right to life, liberty & property. The act of an adult taking drugs (or drinking for that matter), does not affect me one iota. Nor does it affect you. If they decide to get behind the wheel of a motor vehicle, THAT act, not the drug use, is the problem.
Someone steals to support a drug habit? STEALING is the problem. If I'm successful enough to support my habits, regardless of what they are, it's not business of yours. Be it a $5 a day pot habit or a $500 a day cocaine habit. Learn the difference between the crime, the abuse and the substance. Stop trying to penalize responsible people for the actions of the irresponsible.
Drug prohibition does more to make Americans unsafe than any other factor. Just as alcohol prohibition gave us the mafia, drug prohibition has given us the Crips, the Bloods and drive-by shootings.
Consider the historical evidence: America's murder rate rose nearly 70% during alcohol prohibition, but returned to its previous levels after prohibition ended.
Now, since the War on Drugs began, America's murder rates have doubled. The cause/effect relationship is clear. Prohibition is putting innocent lives at risk.
You honestly CAN'T be this dense... Are you playing Devil's Advocate, or is there some unstated agenda that would expain your unwillingness to interject some logic into this?