Poodles;1053443 said:
did someone say fiberglass fenders?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/TOYO...ryZ36475QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Not much out there, that's all I've been able to find.
It's easy to get weight off the back of the car, so the front is where you need the work. Everyone always looks past making the engine lighter...
Sheetmetal FFIM would be a LOT lighter than the stock setup. Sheetmetal cam covers, billet aluminum brackets, ect would shave a ton of weight off the engine...
Yeah, but those fenders are ugly. And they don't say if they're wider than stock and they don't tell you how much they weigh. The metal fenders alone aren't that heavy and there's a possibility that those could be as heavy or heavier than the stock fenders.
I'm not looking past making the engine lighter. I'm getting rid of the iron block. That will save a ton of weight there.
But if you're keeping it, there's still stuff you can do. It just can be hard or expensive after you get rid of all the easy stuff.
Ma70.Ent;1053446 said:
Well is there any negative effect/consequence from removing all the P/S related components and keeping the current rack, other than it being hard to steer?
The rack isn't designed to work like that and it would make steering harder than if you were using a real manual rack. I don't know if the rack will fail earlier or anything like that. I just don't think there's a point to removing it all without making any other changes.
RedEj8;1053462 said:
For shits, my 7mgte/r154 complete engine(all accessories,turbo,everything!.. both full of oil, etc...) attached to a pallet wrapped in saran wrap. Shipping weight was 775lbs..
775lbs, well that's a lot.
AGlobalThreat;1053711 said:
What about the weight distribution? I'm trying to keep weight in the rear; there's a lot more I can remove back there but I'm trying to get closer to 50/50 while still dramatically lowering the overall weight of the car.
Btw nothing is legal these days anyways, you can get scratch resistant lexan and take good care of it, and then replace it if/when the time comes.
I would rather have the car light enough that I could add ballast to than to keep unneeded parts in the car just for the sake of static balance. Like, I would rather have the car weight 2700lbs and have a 60% front weight distribution, so then I could add 100-200lbs of ballast to the back, still have a lightweight car and be able to tune the weight distribution of the car.
And a non-ideal weight distribution can be accounted for. It's not good, but it's not as bad as people think. And 50/50 isn't the greatest thing in the world either. There's so much more that goes into it. And with front engined cars that get stripped, it's can be match the weight removal in the front with how much you remove from the back.
There are more extreme things that you can do, moving radiators and cooling systems, cutting stuff out of the front of the car, moving the engine back, moving the driver back, etc. There's a lot you can do to improve the weight distribution.
But I would rather have a lighter car with a balance I could tune than a heavier car with a decent balance.
one jay;1053793 said:
What is the point of this post?