Nomad707;937909 said:Mostly superchargers have a lot of parasitic loss (look it up) while turbochargers have zero, and which are much more efficient in their no-loss power creation
turbochargers are the most logical way to go.
Nice try. :nono:AJ'S 88NA;938039 said:Hey NA guys have boost, it's called ACIS
CyFi6;938485 said:No, i dont think turbo's are fake power, but theyre not the power im very interested in. Turbos are cool, dont get me wrong, they are very efficient, but unless im putting out MAJOR horsepower i feel like i should be able to do it without a turbo, and strictly design.
supramacist;938070 said:Parasitic loss is a given when dealing with a super charger.
So there's really nothing to look up if you get the theory of things.
The most logical way to go is to build an engine that actually puts out the ponies without the use of either.
IJ.;938840 said:The problem with that approach is with only 3.0L and a 3500+ lb car you're already limited by the need for low to midrange torque to move the fat pigs.
ANY modification to an NA motor is going to move the torque curve upwards in the powerband and drivability will suffer unless you use very low diff gears, then highway cruise and economy suffer.
Forced induction helps overcome ALL of these downfalls and is a viable option giving the best of both worlds, power and economy.
BorHor;939040 said:I am NA because I heard turbos ate squirrels. And I love those little things. When I hear a turbo's drive by I can hear them crying
PCguylovesSupra;939995 said:I am curious to see what I can do with it. I think I can get it to 275-300+ hp.