Zach said:
Deciding was your first problem. There was no decision to make, just do it right and forget about it.
Those two dowel pins locate the head more precisely than 14 studs because of very tight tolerances around the pins. There's a little bit of room around all your head studs, but no real room around the dowel pins.
Excellent, look at teh second paragraph. Now go read my first post. HE ANSWERED MY QUESTION. Why would I need the dowels? They more accurately locate the head. THANKS!
jetjock said:
I'm surprised anyone needing to ask this question in the first place would be rebuilding engines. Not a good sign.
What did this contribute to the thread? Thanks for your uninformed analysis of my abilities.
ma70t said:
your gasket should be fine because it was didnt even see a heat cycle yet
but you made a good choice to put the dowels in tho good luck with the motor nice job by the way
Look! another answer... I asked about the coating ater the head is torqued down. Thanks.
mkIIIman089 said:
Gee... why did you even bother asking on here? EVERYONE told you to put them in, then you deicde not to until you call some guy and HE says put them in? LOL
EVERYONE here told me to put them in...except one guy. and then another after this post of yours. And I spoke with quite a few people outside of SM, and that was why I installed some more parts that I could EASILY leave on while I replaced the dowels. THis was so I could accomplish some more while i gathered more info.
nosechunks said:
i did the same thing, over the course of my funds time limited 2 year build it slipped my mind, remembered it 3 days later while it was still on the stand pulled the head off, popped them on and the coating was fine. im running a cometic 2mm with arp's.
This one is REALLY worth quoting. Not only did he answer a question I had, but he accurately cited his own experience which is extremely pertinent to my situation. Fantastic.
jdub said:
It sure is...since he used motor oil, the ARP stud torque spec is 105 ft/lbs...it's 81 ft/lbs w/ moly. The torque spec should not be exceeded.
ARP changed the specs, here is a copy of the sheet
mkIIIman089 said:
No he didn't, he asked, and then ignored what everyone on here told him!
Same as your last post, my reply is above (RE: not EVERYONE is on SM....etc)
jetjock said:
Mistakes are when you know what you're doing and screw up. That's not the same as "how can two pins locate something better than 14 bolts" and "if the head is together the bolts will keep it centered".
Time and again I see guys deep into doing stuff when they don't know how precision things are manufactured and assembled. Worse, they don't know they don't know. Such folks should not be building engines without experienced help. In this case he had the foresight to ask but in the words of Harry Callahan "a mans got to know his limitations". Too often I see people here who don't.
WOW! Another brilliant post of how dumb people are!(referring to the poeple you are describing here). Thanks for categorizing me. I have done quite a few automotive projects; however, this is not a pissing contest, so i will not list them. My areas of expertise prior to this engine project were limited to steering/suspension systems, manual transmissions, and electrical systems. Now I am learing how to rebuild an engine.
EDIT: I would have greatly appreciated some experianced help while rebuilding this engine. The only guy I knew that had rebiult many engines is not real thorough. He said F%&* the dowels, run it without them. I didn't listen to him.
veedubin said:
studs into block was as called for ----- "HAND TIGHT ONLY"
nuts onto studs 80ft/lb broke to 5 incriments as to not warp anything
See above for torque spec. And I did tighten them into the block by hand, then the nuts 20 lb*ft at a time, all the way to spec.