ma70suprawoner;1761828 said:im sorry but a 400k plus supra will not save Toyota in this economy if they bring back a rwd sports car it should cost around 17k depending on options to compete other wise were all just dreaming of a car that will sit on are walls rather then are drive ways
Because that's the price range it's been in. The Supra has never been able to compete against the Mustang / Camaro because it's a crapload more coin.Poodles;1761953 said:Why on earth are you guys trying to compare it to a Corvette? The Corvette isn't the same class as the Supra at all. While the Corvette is a giant killer, it's not nearly as refined as it's betters, and the Supra was always about refinement.
Agreed. I'd be really surprised if it were under 100k. Consider this:Poodles;1762037 said:Man, I dunno why you guys are talking about such low numbers. The MKIII was stacked against cars like the Porsche 944, while the MKIV was stacked against 911's IIRC. Go look at the price of a 911
GrimJack;1762049 said:Agreed. I'd be really surprised if it were under 100k. Consider this:
Mk2 was ~17k in 1985
Mk3 was ~29k in 1989
Mk4 was ~51k in 1995
Just adjusting for inflation, that makes it:
Mk2 is ~35k today
Mk3 is ~51k today
Mk4 is ~73k today
So logically, they've boosted the price by ~44% each time they released a new model, and $73k + 44% is $105,430. That's the bare minimum price I'd expect, and somehow I suspect it would be even higher than that.
BMW is talking about going V6 in the M3
would a new Supra be a V6?