I get into this topic alot with people and just curious what everyone here thinks about it.
Short personal gun history;
I own a springfield armory xd9 and love it, being my first handgun I had zero experience before it. A friend bought his first pistol at the same time as me, a smith and wesson .45(not sure on model).
We went to the range the first few times together and my aim quickly(1st day) became pretty good(silhouette head/body shots). My friend with his .45 couldnt hit anything with any constancy at 20-25 yards. We traded guns and I had the same problem, couldnt get the accuracy dialed in as easy/fast. We did double taps and mine were Very close, his were lucky to be on the paper at all. I know all of this is remedy with practice however.
Now for me, I still like my 9mm. I feel I can be very accurate with it and in the end a headshot with a 9mm Vs. .45 is still a kill either way. I get it from people all the time that my gun is a girls gun and has no stopping power etc. The same people giving me grief are the type of people that go buy the biggest pistol they can and never practice at the range with it. They always say 'I dont need to be accurate because I have true stopping power'.
If my .45 friend is anything to go by, even Hitting the target is a real task so how does bigger = better for a newbie/non-range junkie? I also pointed out the possibility of missing and the .45 passing through walls and hitting people that way etc. It always ends with 'I have to have the most stopping power'.
Do any long time(read accurate) shooters prefer a caliber namely for carried self defense and why? What do the pros consider to be optimal situations for small/big caliber pistols? Or really is it just personal preference as long as you can hit the target with the gun you have?
Short personal gun history;
I own a springfield armory xd9 and love it, being my first handgun I had zero experience before it. A friend bought his first pistol at the same time as me, a smith and wesson .45(not sure on model).
We went to the range the first few times together and my aim quickly(1st day) became pretty good(silhouette head/body shots). My friend with his .45 couldnt hit anything with any constancy at 20-25 yards. We traded guns and I had the same problem, couldnt get the accuracy dialed in as easy/fast. We did double taps and mine were Very close, his were lucky to be on the paper at all. I know all of this is remedy with practice however.
Now for me, I still like my 9mm. I feel I can be very accurate with it and in the end a headshot with a 9mm Vs. .45 is still a kill either way. I get it from people all the time that my gun is a girls gun and has no stopping power etc. The same people giving me grief are the type of people that go buy the biggest pistol they can and never practice at the range with it. They always say 'I dont need to be accurate because I have true stopping power'.
If my .45 friend is anything to go by, even Hitting the target is a real task so how does bigger = better for a newbie/non-range junkie? I also pointed out the possibility of missing and the .45 passing through walls and hitting people that way etc. It always ends with 'I have to have the most stopping power'.
Do any long time(read accurate) shooters prefer a caliber namely for carried self defense and why? What do the pros consider to be optimal situations for small/big caliber pistols? Or really is it just personal preference as long as you can hit the target with the gun you have?