Setting up Efans will be a matter of preference, and they will do a great job at cooling your car. I have had efans for over 5 years with no cooling issues. I found if the fuse blew out you will need a spare. If there is no fuse a jumper wire will get you going until you get to an auto supply store.
I have found that you need a vey good sensor setup. I powered mine off the ac senor that powered the stock auxillary fan with no issues what so ever for 5 years. I used 10 gauge wire, and 2 40 amp relays. I used one relay for each fan. You can wire a remote manual switch to have them to turn on manually.
The stock set up is more reliabe but only to the point of whether or not your belts are in good condition. The stock set up weakness is the shroud usaullay is broken or in poor condition, or just missing. The belts can, and do break and you will be stuck until you get one. Clutch's can and will start underperforming and you won't know until this happens. I have had new belts wear and break prematurely due too high reviving big boosting pulls. Don't dare get anything but GATES belts and hoses. When the stock belt breaks you are done until you install a replacement. I have been stuck because of this scenario a few times, and I always buy gates belts unless an emergency calls for what ever the store has until you can get a gates belt.
My car always continue to remain as cool as my stock setup, and also if I wanted to I have full ECU control of what temperature my fans will start cooling my engine. This you can not do with a stock fan.
My car warms up faster in the winter while setup on a sensor switch, and cold oil takes a longer time to heat up. It takes a while for oil to get to 180 degrees if you are running it through a full time oil cooler with a thermostat. I watch my gauges during warm up every day and oil is the last to make operating temps in the winter, and the summer.
There so far isn't any proof that suggest that a properly set up efan will under perform a stock fan setup. If there is proof I'd like to see the factual data. I feel in stand still traffic the efans have an advantage. I feel at cruising temps they are just as efficient if set up properly because my efans don't come on until I am operating at a certain engine temp. I am not debating which has more CFM's at certain speeds either because my engine temps so far have remained cooled with my efans under all conditions, and they
may cool better at idle than stock.
While driving durimg the winter my fans never come on until I stop. During the summer they come on more but mostly when I am at a stand still. At a stand still in the summer they are never always on unless in stop and go NYC traffic. Even then they are intermittent. This I guess is where you may or may not have a power savings that some talk about. I am not inferring or debaing that it is a savings at all. However logically there could be in theory because of less drag from the stock belt.
All this to say there are good points, and not so good points for using both systems. The reliability of both is dependent on many variables. Efans must have perfectly set up fault resistant wiring and relays. Stock fan must have perfect running clutch's and belts with good condition shrouds in place.
I can say that there are electric fans that are working over 10 years with no issues. The ford contour fan I first bought years ago came from a 96 ford countour and lasted until I changed to my new ford Taurus single fan. I feel my only problem will be whether or not another high out put single fan will take its place......NOT!
No matter which way you go there will be at some point a need to address a failure, and for me a fan that has a blown fuse or a bad relay is easier to get me home than a broken belt or failing clutch. Yes... reliabilty seems to lean more toward the stock belt setup, however I have personal new found knowledge about electric fans that has made me an expert on making them run unless my fan has just up and died.
This has NEVER happened to me!:naughty::biglaugh:
The choice is yours!