I am in the middle of building my new computer and I am having trouble deciding on a few components. Right now, Intel and ATI seem like the top dogs so I am going that route.
If anyone has advice for me, I would like it but you must consider these points:
Must be LGA775 [have mobo already]
I prefer a 45nm process and a 1333 FSB [will match to RAM]
I don't give a rat's ass about overclocking potential, so no "get an E8400 and overclock it instead of an E8500" or "get a q6600 and overclock the piss out of it" replies.
I will not spend more than a couple hundred, so no "extreme" waste of money CPUs.
Quad Core or Dual Core does not matter TOO much. The processors I am considering most are the E8500, Q9400 and Q9550.
The downside of the Q9400 is thermals and cache size - quad-core 95W 2.5GHz, 6MB L2 Cache. The plus is having extra cores for a decent price [between the price of the two below].
The downside of the E8500 is lower cache and "only" two cores - dual-core 65W 3.16GHz, 6MB L2 Cache. The plus is lower thermal design compared to quad-cores, and it is the cheapest of the three.
The downside of the Q9550 is thermals and price - quad-core 95W 2.83GHz, 12MB L2 Cache - more expensive than the other two by over $100, but it's not a bank-breaker. The plus is having extra cores and more cache.
None of these +s or -s are breakers really - as far as thermal design goes, even the quad cores have lower thermals than my Opteron165 [probably partially due to the design process being halved from 90nm to 45].
Now from what I have read, games aren't optimized for quad cores yet, and many dual cores excel slightly in gaming because of this, however will a quad core make a huge difference if I am encoding video WHILE playing a game? The major slowdown is the reason I have not done such things in the past.
I am also torn between getting one expensive dual-slot VGA card [probably a 4870x2] or getting one mid-range single slot VGA card, and add a second one later [ie: dual 4850s in crossfire].
As it stands now, I have a x1950Pro and the only gaming I do is WoW, but when raiding with 24 other people my framerates can drop terribly. The expansion may introduce new visuals or need for a little more oomph, too. I am also interested in Fallout3, which is due out soon.
One more issue about the video cards is the amount of room available; I am building inside of a top-shelf Shuttle [SX48p2 Deluxe]. There is room for the cards and I am adding a 450W Thermaltake auxiliary VGA power supply in the 5 1/4" bay, so power for the cards won't be a problem, but I am worried a little about heat; no matter how great the shuttle cooling system is known to be, I wonder if it would have a problem with the heat from all of those components, especially two 4850s.
All in all, I want a modest gaming box that won't break the bank or turn into a space heater like my old P4 and my current Opteron. If anyone has insight or experience with any of these components, I'd like to hear. Newegg has many reviews, but I get tired of seeing people mark a processor down for the mere fact that it doesn't overclock well; that's like buying a NA and then complaining that it didn't come with a turbo.
If anyone has advice for me, I would like it but you must consider these points:
Must be LGA775 [have mobo already]
I prefer a 45nm process and a 1333 FSB [will match to RAM]
I don't give a rat's ass about overclocking potential, so no "get an E8400 and overclock it instead of an E8500" or "get a q6600 and overclock the piss out of it" replies.
I will not spend more than a couple hundred, so no "extreme" waste of money CPUs.
Quad Core or Dual Core does not matter TOO much. The processors I am considering most are the E8500, Q9400 and Q9550.
The downside of the Q9400 is thermals and cache size - quad-core 95W 2.5GHz, 6MB L2 Cache. The plus is having extra cores for a decent price [between the price of the two below].
The downside of the E8500 is lower cache and "only" two cores - dual-core 65W 3.16GHz, 6MB L2 Cache. The plus is lower thermal design compared to quad-cores, and it is the cheapest of the three.
The downside of the Q9550 is thermals and price - quad-core 95W 2.83GHz, 12MB L2 Cache - more expensive than the other two by over $100, but it's not a bank-breaker. The plus is having extra cores and more cache.
None of these +s or -s are breakers really - as far as thermal design goes, even the quad cores have lower thermals than my Opteron165 [probably partially due to the design process being halved from 90nm to 45].
Now from what I have read, games aren't optimized for quad cores yet, and many dual cores excel slightly in gaming because of this, however will a quad core make a huge difference if I am encoding video WHILE playing a game? The major slowdown is the reason I have not done such things in the past.
I am also torn between getting one expensive dual-slot VGA card [probably a 4870x2] or getting one mid-range single slot VGA card, and add a second one later [ie: dual 4850s in crossfire].
As it stands now, I have a x1950Pro and the only gaming I do is WoW, but when raiding with 24 other people my framerates can drop terribly. The expansion may introduce new visuals or need for a little more oomph, too. I am also interested in Fallout3, which is due out soon.
One more issue about the video cards is the amount of room available; I am building inside of a top-shelf Shuttle [SX48p2 Deluxe]. There is room for the cards and I am adding a 450W Thermaltake auxiliary VGA power supply in the 5 1/4" bay, so power for the cards won't be a problem, but I am worried a little about heat; no matter how great the shuttle cooling system is known to be, I wonder if it would have a problem with the heat from all of those components, especially two 4850s.
All in all, I want a modest gaming box that won't break the bank or turn into a space heater like my old P4 and my current Opteron. If anyone has insight or experience with any of these components, I'd like to hear. Newegg has many reviews, but I get tired of seeing people mark a processor down for the mere fact that it doesn't overclock well; that's like buying a NA and then complaining that it didn't come with a turbo.