CLEAR REAR INDICATOR CONVERSION.......

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
xrated89 said:
i dunno about the older ones but the new ones i pryed them out was a lil bit of work but not to bad I have the amber pieces out of them if anybody did want pics or anything

Hiya,

Well for me it would be useful to see pic of either part you have as the unit I have ceratinly doesn't appear as if it would pry apart, so I'm going to try cut it with surgical precision:naughty:
 

cwapface

Supernerd
Mar 30, 2005
464
0
0
43
Eugene, OR
www.dylanwiggins.com
On the taillights, the amber inserts are easy to remove and replace with just a pair of pliers and some coaxing

normal_DSC_2429.jpg
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
wolfie308 said:
Actually, I reckon they aren't glued, but pressed together whilst one or both is still hot and soft.

I've dissected 3 side markers from an '87 and an '88 Supra. Those, as far as I recall, were cemented. I ended up using a fine toothed saw to cut them apart.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
CRE said:
I've dissected 3 side markers from an '87 and an '88 Supra. Those, as far as I recall, were cemented. I ended up using a fine toothed saw to cut them apart.

Looked at it closely under a magnifier and you could well be right - looks like the amber part has a lip sitting over the edge of the backing part. I'll be using a fine toothed disc on the Dremel.

Did you have any luck with the next stage after separating the 2 parts?
 

Wills7MGTE

( . )( . )'s RULE!!!!
May 12, 2006
1,077
0
0
38
Jackson, MO
www.myspace.com
I have front turn signals clear and ordered side markers for the front, I like the rear lighting, I may use LED bulbs next time I change them but otherwise nothing, If anything I'd JDM smoke them, stock looks good though.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
cwapface said:
On the taillights, the amber inserts are easy to remove and replace with just a pair of pliers and some coaxing

It's starting to make sense....I think... If I understand correctly,the rear lens I have already made is for the early model which much more of a 'lens' and is the version fitted to early and late model U.K spec cars.

Your photo is of the later model unit, where it appears that removing the amber shield is pretty straightforward without having to split the unit. Making this in clear would be pretty easy - I just wonder because it's just a cover rather than a lens, how beneficial it would be doing it in clear would be. I would guess that the improvement would not justify the price I would have to ask.

If as was suggested, this unit wasn't fitted to U.K cars, then I'll concentrate on the earlier model, which although more difficult, will benefit a lot more from the replacement, whether you fit an amber filament bulb or an LED cluster bulb.

Hope to have progress to report on the sides by middle of next week and also have cast the other side of the early rear with any luck.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
tekdeus said:
Do people want the bubble markers just because it's JDM? I vote for the clean stock look of the flat side markers, for the simple reason that they look better, IMHO.

This is always the the way if you give people choices:icon_bigg but for now, because I've got a bubble type unit on my workbench, that's the one I'm going to trial on. Fully understand some people would prefer the flat type, but also for me, the bubble will produce a more impressive result as a piece of work.........I hope :biglaugh:
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
wolfie308 said:
Looked at it closely under a magnifier and you could well be right - looks like the amber part has a lip sitting over the edge of the backing part. I'll be using a fine toothed disc on the Dremel.

Did you have any luck with the next stage after separating the 2 parts?

Yes, there is a lip on the amber lens.

I have made a few accurate molds of both parts. I made them using both latex and silicone mediums. My issue has been the presence of bubbles on the inside of the retroreflector everytime I attempted to produce a lens. I suspect I may need a more rigid mold.

When it comes to the back half (the ABS portion) I'd been thinking that perhaps using screws for mounting instead of the ABS tabs may be more practical... at least as far as an anti-theft measure.

If you don't mind my asking, what type of resin do you use? The resin I've been trying is an acrylic/polyesther blend with a UV stabilizing additive. Though I've put off buying more of the additive until I learn how to create these without the bubble issue. PM me if you'd rather not advertise.


tekdeus said:
Do people want the bubble markers just because it's JDM? I vote for the clean stock look of the flat side markers, for the simple reason that they look better, IMHO.

I concur. Actually, I thought it'd be sweet (at least for those of us with pre89 moulding) to make a lens which follows the moulding's profile completely... nice and smooth, no extrusion.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
Morning CRE,

Hmmmm.........so another caster eh? I knew there must be a few others of us out there:evil2:

As this is what I do for a living not just a hobby, you'll understand me being a bit coy about some aspects of the procedure and materials I use. A number of people have tried doing this before, but as far as I'm aware, nobody else is currently producing these to my standard using this technique.

I'll P.M you a bit later with a few comments.

p.s Retroflective type lenses with deep cut multi facetted surfaces are the most difficult to achieve, however the slight ribbed pattern on the inside of the bobble type side indicator should be quite easy.:biglaugh:
 

pimptrizkit

thread killer
Dec 22, 2005
1,572
0
0
vancouver Wa
i have a set of pre-89 flat usdm side markers, your more then willing to have, so long as atleast one set is made :evil2: i have a parts car that will be going to scrap in about 1-2 months and i would like to get all the use out of the parts as possible.

i am down for either bubble or flat markers, i think bubble would be cool and different. but so would the clear flat ones..

either way, if your willing to consider, pm me your address and i'll get them out asap.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
pimptrizkit said:
i have a set of pre-89 flat usdm side markers, your more then willing to have, so long as atleast one set is made :evil2: i have a parts car that will be going to scrap in about 1-2 months and i would like to get all the use out of the parts as possible.

i am down for either bubble or flat markers, i think bubble would be cool and different. but so would the clear flat ones..

either way, if your willing to consider, pm me your address and i'll get them out asap.

Cheers for the offer,

Please hang onto them,as although I'm going to start with the JDM, there seems to be interest in the USDM flat ones in the U.K too.

First I need to cut the JDM's and try casting the rear case as to date I have only done lenses and not the backings. Shouldn't be a problem though as the material is a lot easier to work with than clear.

CRE mentioned some kind of screw fitting, due to security 'issues' as these are likely to be rare and desirable items:evil2: , but first I'll be looking to copy the current clip arrangement. Will try cutting the first case over the weekend, if I'm allowed to sneak off to the workshop for an hour or so.
 

CRE

7M-GE + MAFT Pro + T = :D
Oct 24, 2005
3,485
0
0
Denver, CO
wolfie308 said:
Morning CRE,

Hmmmm.........so another caster eh? I knew there must be a few others of us out there:evil2:

As this is what I do for a living not just a hobby, you'll understand me being a bit coy about some aspects of the procedure and materials I use. A number of people have tried doing this before, but as far as I'm aware, nobody else is currently producing these to my standard using this technique.

I'll P.M you a bit later with a few comments.

p.s Retroflective type lenses with deep cut multi facetted surfaces are the most difficult to achieve, however the slight ribbed pattern on the inside of the bobble type side indicator should be quite easy.:biglaugh:

Hey Wolfie!

I'm not really even a hobbyist when it comes to casting. I've worked with it a few times back when I was employed with a local plastics fabrication company, but most of my experience is in working with acrylic casts, extrusions, etc.

Your products look great! I love that unlike most companies you keep the OEM look (ie: the retroreflector). Keep it up!
 

xrated89

New Member
Sep 12, 2005
120
0
0
Canada
sorry it took so long i forgot about this thread these are the pieces out of my 89 tail lights
 

Attachments

  • DSC00141.JPG
    DSC00141.JPG
    139.9 KB · Views: 25
  • DSC00142.JPG
    DSC00142.JPG
    116 KB · Views: 19

A-model_

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
84
0
0
TX
Wolf do you have any pictures of the actual lense installled but unlit? Im curious to see how clean the marker would look , judingng by that espirit they must look awsome. I have taken the diffusers out of the tails and painted the back/brake lights surrounding black, the turn marker reflective silver, and removed that amber piece. Imho it takes, years off, the look of the supra. Where the newer kind makes the car look wider, the pre 89 makes the car look smaller more compact. Keep up the good work and with the quality of the parts there is alot of market for the clearable lenses on stock applications.
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
A-model_ said:
Wolf do you have any pictures of the actual lense installled but unlit? Im curious to see how clean the marker would look , judingng by that espirit they must look awsome. I have taken the diffusers out of the tails and painted the back/brake lights surrounding black, the turn marker reflective silver, and removed that amber piece. Imho it takes, years off, the look of the supra. Where the newer kind makes the car look wider, the pre 89 makes the car look smaller more compact. Keep up the good work and with the quality of the parts there is alot of market for the clearable lenses on stock applications.

Hi there A-Model,

You rubbed the lens , and the genie appears:naughty: ....your wish is my command....just took these in the Sunday morning sun. This what my little mock up housing looks like - sprayed inside with chrome to give you an idea

http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f11/wolfie308/Supraclearrearunlit.jpg
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f11/wolfie308/Supraclearunlitrear.jpg

Reckon there looking pretty sweet and can't wait to get one fiitted in the cluster I'm expecting soon. If you look carefully there's been an accidental effect which actually enhances the look of the lens. Each facet has trapped an almost identical bubble in each cell of the lens. I think this will actually aid the light dispersal/scattering and have the effect of further brightening the look of the lens due to the additional facets. I hope I can regularly repeat the effect.

xrated89 - thanks for the pics of the late lenses. These look pretty straightforard from what I can tell. Due to them being more of a shield than a lens as such, I wonder if the look would be as effective as you'd still be able to see the back of the housing through them, which is not a look that I particularly like.

However, if these weren't fitted to U.K cars, I will be focusing(pardon the pun) on the early ones first, and then sidemarkers which everybody seems to want. Off to try my new angle cutter on the Dremel :evil2:
 

wolfie308

Lensmeister
Sep 5, 2006
92
0
0
Bucks, England
www.protocast.co.uk
Good morning across the pond,

Just to keep you up to date, I cast the other side this aftenoon and below is the first pair in existence.......now that's unique :evil2: I knocked up another little box housing, sprayed it chrome, wired them up and yep, I reckon it's looking good. I have a rear cluster on it's way to me an hope to be able to report favourably on the dissection and post pics of the final result. All being well, I should be abe to get another to make a pair to be fitted to the first lucky owners car :naughty: The third pic you might like is my Corolla/Esprit clear rear conversion, which if you use a bit of imagination, you might be able to get an idea of the finished result.


p346875_1.jpg


sm_photo_missing.jpg
[/IMG]

sm_photo_missing.jpg
[/IMG]
 

KeithH

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
1,716
0
0
Portland, OR
tekdeus said:
Do people want the bubble markers just because it's JDM? I vote for the clean stock look of the flat side markers, for the simple reason that they look better, IMHO.

I prefer the "bubble" markers because they add a bit of new functionality if you do the side blinker rewire. This is beneficial when you have someone that isn't far enough back to see your rear turn signal giving them a warning that you intend to come over because they can see this bubble blinking on the front of the car.

I actually think they "look" cooler as well.