91 Stang kill

pgiller

pgiller

Boost addict
Sep 16, 2008
260
0
0
Licking MO
I own a 89 mk3 with very minor mods. Well where I live there arnt any imports, I am the only one within 30mile radius with a supra. Most of my friends drive 5.0 stangs and are constantly bragging on them. Well yesterday I finally got all of my boost leaks fixed. Then I took it for a ride to one of my friends house with a 91 5.0 with 3:73 gears, headers, B&M shifter, and CAI. Well long story short we met out on a 3 mile straight away. From the stop sighn to the chevron sign is a quater of a mile (this is where all of the races go down). We raced from a dead stop and I waxed his ass by 4-5 car lenths TWICE!! When we left my friends now have a different point of view of the Supra.
 
03bamaGT

03bamaGT

New Member
Sep 20, 2008
288
0
0
Bham
What do you mean when you say bolt-ons? I have yet to see a stock 5.0 motor w/bolt ons make anything close to that without some new internals like a cam. I dunno though maybe if you got TB, EGR Spacer, Upper/Lower Intake, CAI, O/R midpipe, breathable catback, UDPs...you might get close to 300.

What Bolt-Ons did you have?
 
pgiller

pgiller

Boost addict
Sep 16, 2008
260
0
0
Licking MO
I used to own foxes (5 to be exact) and they r nice and fun to drive but I had to different. Plus BOOST IS AWESOME!!
 
F

foreverpsycotic

Back in the game!
Jul 16, 2006
3,171
12
38
37
ATL
03bamaGT;1166196 said:
What do you mean when you say bolt-ons? I have yet to see a stock 5.0 motor w/bolt ons make anything close to that without some new internals like a cam. I dunno though maybe if you got TB, EGR Spacer, Upper/Lower Intake, CAI, O/R midpipe, breathable catback, UDPs...you might get close to 300.

What Bolt-Ons did you have?
Click to expand...

Her old setup was heads, cam, upper and lower intake, longtubes, h-pipe, CAI, maf, TB, 3.73s, tko, a short shifter and a timing adjustment. I rode in the car, and it was strong, but i think it might have been 350 @ the crank.
 
03bamaGT

03bamaGT

New Member
Sep 20, 2008
288
0
0
Bham
Yea that sounds like a strong car...definitely a 350HP car.

Usually a cam and heads is not included in the bolt-on list...
 
F

foreverpsycotic

Back in the game!
Jul 16, 2006
3,171
12
38
37
ATL
03bamaGT;1166479 said:
Yea that sounds like a strong car...definitely a 350HP car.

Usually a cam and heads is not included in the bolt-on list...
Click to expand...

It just falls under the "Mustang Stock" list, but then again, so does a 331.
 
03bamaGT

03bamaGT

New Member
Sep 20, 2008
288
0
0
Bham
Depends on the engine,mods, driver, exhaust, etc...I am not really familiar with Supra's but what HP would you expect from those mods?

A built 306 is nothing to take lightly.
 
brad horton

brad horton

New Member
Oct 20, 2008
102
0
0
Alabama
if you want to build a real fox you need need to go a 351w block. they make lots more power a camed 1969 with a intake and carb 351w can make around 400hp at the flywheel. not bad in car under 3000 pounds. btw i have a extra 351w block 60 over if any one wants to the swap in there supra.
 
03bamaGT

03bamaGT

New Member
Sep 20, 2008
288
0
0
Bham
Yea...if you want to make a low end torque 1/8th mile car then go with a 351.

The 306 is a screamer...306 can make the same HP just at a higher RPM. I have known some 306 owners to redline at 6500-7500, which is crazy for a domestic V8. They are a different kind of animal. They make great 1/4 mile and highway cars.
 
03bamaGT

03bamaGT

New Member
Sep 20, 2008
288
0
0
Bham
Yea but then you are looking at the total time to get the larger rotational mass of the 351 to those higher RPMs...the 306 is just a great all around block.

I am not saying the 351W is bad...just that it is a heavier motor that requires more to get it moving. It makes a great, strong bracket car or quarter car but lacks the upper MPH and upper RPM that the 306 shines in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom