2jz NO! NO! They'v gone bad
- Thread starter 88-7MGTE
- Start date
Fail. A fast Neon is still a Neon. I don't give a shit what it can beat, it will always be a Neon. That's not at all like your Supra comparison. A Supra is a performance car. A Neon, no matter what is done to it, is still a FWD econobox. Deal with it.
lmao at the double standard...a fwd econobox that kills our cars stock to stock and judging by the wad your panties are in over this they can beat your car too. Going off of your "philosophy" the mk3 supra was more luxury than sport so we will always be a luxury car...aka slow tank.Quin;1451765 said:
:nono:
Double standard on more than one account. We don't like being looked down upon but look down on other cars.
I don't care WTF it is, if it's fast and clean it has my respect.
I don't care WTF it is, if it's fast and clean it has my respect.
If you have alot of money , you can make anything go fast . It doesn't mater if Neon run 10sec or 11sec "it just a neon" which is the same class with Civic ; they both front wheel drive with tiny axles and tranny .They both for girls or fuel economy cars not trully sport cars at all and people tried to make them run fast . Supras are designed as true sport cars themself even n/a . Not really how fast but how it looks , most people on this forum own supras because they love the sporty look of supras and they're rwd and alot of torques !
yes indeed.Poodles;1451819 said:
lol how much money will it take to make a supra fast and stay n/a? I'll lay my title down saying that any srt-4 can take down an n/a supra with quite a bit of money in it. Don't be mad because your supra couldn't take down an srt4 with the wastegate line unhooked lol. You guys are truly sad.jtran8;1451837 said:
What's hard to understand about this? Economy. Car. Fast or not, it's still based off of (you guessed it!) an ECONOMY CAR. So what, if a Corolla Type S (or whatever the sport model is, you get the idea) ran mid to high 13s stock you'd respect it because it was faster than a MkIII? lol. Same principal.
I really don't think it's a double standard, I'm calling it like it is. It's not a performance car, it's a sport model of an economy car. You're not getting it, it's not just about speed to me.
As I said before, I don't care if it's got 500fwhp and pulls a grey hound on me, at the end of the day, he went home in a Neon. Stock for stock, no, they don't beat my car, at least not the two I've raced. Even with a couple light mods it's a driver's race.
I really don't think it's a double standard, I'm calling it like it is. It's not a performance car, it's a sport model of an economy car. You're not getting it, it's not just about speed to me.
As I said before, I don't care if it's got 500fwhp and pulls a grey hound on me, at the end of the day, he went home in a Neon. Stock for stock, no, they don't beat my car, at least not the two I've raced. Even with a couple light mods it's a driver's race.
guess they need to find better drivers...because a stock srt4 will eat a stock mk3. And if your win is him putting buses on you but "still going home a neon" then you are a sad sad little man. That makes it worse that a car you dont even respect is faster than yours out of the box. I understand that it was BASED off an economy car. You sir are far too dense for me to waste my time with...enjoy the bliss that is well.....i'll let you think about it.Quin;1451919 said:
Supra_Villan;1451939 said:
What makes you think I own a MkIII? lol I haven't had a Supra in almost a year, not counting three days in April. I've never had a stock one, either.
Shit guys, faster out of the box!!! You must really respect V6 Mustangs then, pretty sure the 05+s are faster than MkIII's stock... If you want to compare stock cars, I'm pretty sure there are mini-vans faster than stock MkIIIs, make sure you pay your respects next time you see a soccer mom dropping her kids off at school ::hah::
EDIT: After two minutes of looking, I found out that an 04 Volvo wagon is faster than a MkIII! lol Lot of random surprising vehicles, an 04 Forester 2.5 XT goes 0-60 in 5.3 and runs a 13.8, Saturn Aura XR 5.9 14.5, a 95 Bonneville is faster than a 73 T/A with a 455... I'm kinda glad I went to look into this, I'm cracking up now.
Last edited:
Like i said , if you have alot of money you can make anything run fast ; it doesn't mater how fast Neon and Civic are , they still looks gay and rice ! For those who love Neon and Civic so much ( why don't you sell your supra and get yourself one of those gay car ? ) You got to remember , this is "SUPRAMANIA" forum .
damn talk about butthurt...
Makes me wonder how many people got their asses handed to them by a neon.
like i said before, i own both, and the neon was cheaper to make fast, handle better, brake faster (not break), and it seats more. and has a factory MHG.
they make massive amounts of torque, and if you can drive they can hook off the line.
anyone here bashing on a srt-4 has never been in one before.
Makes me wonder how many people got their asses handed to them by a neon.
like i said before, i own both, and the neon was cheaper to make fast, handle better, brake faster (not break), and it seats more. and has a factory MHG.
they make massive amounts of torque, and if you can drive they can hook off the line.
anyone here bashing on a srt-4 has never been in one before.
Poodles;1451819 said:
I agree 100% with that, I even have respect for a crx if it can do 9 sec 1/4, I mean, gotta hand it to the owner, that fucker got balls and loves his car.
in the end, isn't that what we all are? car enthusiasts? seriously? don't be hating on other cars, I pretty much drove every single type of japanese cars imaginable (I lost about 42k depreciation of all my cars alone, my parents weren't happy).
Quin, judging by your comments, I can guess with some certainty that your Supra is probably an NA? and most likely you try to race people and get beat to a pulp by civics and corolla's? if so, its not anyone else's fault but yours,
I'm pretty sure almost everyone on this forum's car isn't stock in 1 way or another, we put money into our cars. we buy our mk3 at around what.......2-5k? you can't even buy an SRT-4 with that money......so I think it's understandable that we will be wtf pwned by them stock for stock for sure. hell my sister's AWD toyota matrix can probably rape my NA DD car's ass, hell even my brother's sentra can probably kick my NA supra's ass. but if they mess with the 1j, thats a different story.
for the money's worth, I am quite sure you can make the supra go much faster than an SRT-4, and have more fun. I have seen tons of econo family cars of the 21st century give the beat down to stock 20th century sports cars
it's just the way the world is, if you're anti progressive, be prepared to get your ass beat.
I chose to buy my mk3s because I like them for their looks, and the fact that you can't find them anymore, also, pop-up lights gives me a hardon, go figure...... everyone in my family thinks I'm nuts, my parents want me to go get a mercedes, but I chose this instead
I don't say for a moment that my car is better than new cars, it's not, it's old, it's got problems, it needs fixing all the time, no warranty, fucking shitty ass electronics, no ipod connections, it creeks, water seeps in through the seals. but hell, it's my choice, I like it this way, and I'll say it right now, an SRT4 is better than our cars, hell it's newer
that being said, you need to stop denying that your supra is probably super slow and gets no respect and start putting your money where your mouth is.....period..........
that's what I'm doing, can't beat a civic SI with a 7mgte? go 1jz
can't beat a 2010 SS camaro? upgrade the turbos, put in bigger injectors
can't beat a GTR? put in new cams, put in even bigger injectors, go GT35R, get standalone
can't beat something? throw money at your car, it's the solution
I don't know who said it, but I agree with, if it can beat my car, It's got at least some respect from me.
Now, I think everyone is wrong who's comparing a stock SRT against a stock MKIII Turbo.. Wasn't the SRT4 introduced in 03? It's got over a decade newer technology in it. Actually, if you start from 87 when the MKIII was introduced, that's 16 years of technological advances they have to work with.. I HOPE it's faster than a stock MKIII.
Just my .02, I didn't see anyone bring this point up.
EDIT: Lol @ Taja, quoted the post I'm talking about at the same time I posted this
Now, I think everyone is wrong who's comparing a stock SRT against a stock MKIII Turbo.. Wasn't the SRT4 introduced in 03? It's got over a decade newer technology in it. Actually, if you start from 87 when the MKIII was introduced, that's 16 years of technological advances they have to work with.. I HOPE it's faster than a stock MKIII.
Just my .02, I didn't see anyone bring this point up.
EDIT: Lol @ Taja, quoted the post I'm talking about at the same time I posted this
kotu100;1452001 said:
do not personally like their looks, but I have been in 1 before
I must say, the interior is shit quality, even if you go by 1980s standards.
ps: torque steer................understeer, and oh yes, it's not a freaking myth, you will break your transmission
pss: mitsubishi made it an SRT-4, an evo will still rape it's ass
ppsst, the engine is made by dodge. only the turbo is mitsu.
ya the trans will break, shit im on my 2nd r154 in my supra.
im not gonna argue which car is better, i love both of them and i would never sell either. each has it's ups and downs.
now you're gonna compare an awd $40k evo to a $20k fwd neon....
a GTR will still destroy a EVO, whats your point
ya the trans will break, shit im on my 2nd r154 in my supra.
im not gonna argue which car is better, i love both of them and i would never sell either. each has it's ups and downs.
now you're gonna compare an awd $40k evo to a $20k fwd neon....
a GTR will still destroy a EVO, whats your point
lol, read better. I understand why this argument lasted more than two seconds, no one is reading... I've clearly stated multiple times I don't own a Supra anymore, and haven't for a good while.
You guys are about as sharp as basketballs. You just said you don't like the looks, the interior is shitty quality and you don't think they're reliable... You respect them because? Judging by my comments my ass, it's pretty clear you didn't read my posts, didn't look at my user title or notice my lack of owner bar.
Do all it better. Go nutswing off some more Neons.
You guys are about as sharp as basketballs. You just said you don't like the looks, the interior is shitty quality and you don't think they're reliable... You respect them because? Judging by my comments my ass, it's pretty clear you didn't read my posts, didn't look at my user title or notice my lack of owner bar.
Do all it better. Go nutswing off some more Neons.
i like my supra far better than any srt4....but i'm just saying the "i'm better than him cuz its still a neon" bullshit is well...just that bullshit. And good for you for not owning an mk3 anymore? what do you own now thats so great sir?