90 lb/ft is required to get the bolt into its elastic region at its strongest point. They are anticipating you not using that head gasket with studs. Do you know what argument by repetition is? Ignore it in the Supra community.
I went 105.56 with the A340e and my Boss Jr which has a smaller turbine and A/R. If you use the actual formula and a calculator you will find it a little higher. Mine is 366. Your numbers seem right on to me.
It isn't called "perma-torque" for nothing....Federal Mogul makes manufacturer sealing parts for big name auto manufacturers and then put it in the "AC Delco" or "Motorcraft" package.
Don't you love everybody's two cents? But then again, this is an internet forum. PT 9473
The composite part is the facing to get a good seal on imperfect parts.
Of course they do. The problem occurs with detonation and more commonly over heating the engine. Then the deck warps slightly and then a "waterfall" is heard behind the dash.
Not to say the 58 lb/ft is ok. But the head bolts are certainly good. I would also take the Fel-Pro Permatorque over...
Since he has not posted since his opening post in February I will point out that it is more likely he is shifting from first to O/D, as that would happen with a solenoid number 2 malfunction. If number one malfunctioned, it would sit in direct with an upshift to O/D.
Strange as it may seem, nobody has challenged the illegal statutory laws including the ones violating the second amendment. Until now. I am still surprised at the Heller decision. I am surprised because they got it right. And now the other grossly illegal ones like the NFA and the amendment in...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.