I think a 245 is pushing it for a 10" rim. A 255 would be better suited and still be a smaller tire. However, this is just what the manufacturers recommended for tire size.
BorHor said:What do you mean? Like where do we buy our rims? I usually find mine on forums but RBmotoring.com has a nice selection. I know the owner of memoryfab.com but his current stock does not have much low offset rims. You can also buy new rims. Many brands like volk, work, 5zigen, etc have a nice selection of lower offset wheels.
Wiisass said:http://www.theoryinpracticeengineering.com/gallery/d/1981-1/IMG_0532.JPG
18x9.5+12 front, 18x10+18 rear
235/40/18 front and rear
Work XT-7 in the front, XD-9 in the back.
http://www.theoryinpracticeengineering.com/gallery/d/2063-1/IMG_0582.JPG
I thought I had pics with the XT-7's on all around which is how it usually is, but I can't seem to find any and don't want to look anymore. But the 18x10+18 has the same outer fitment as an 18x9.5+12 so they both sit as flush.
Edit: Nevermind, found a side shot with xt-7's all around.
http://www.theoryinpracticeengineering.com/gallery/d/2416-2/IMG_0793.JPG
Dimman said:What about keeping the close to the original overall diameter? Is this important?
Eg: a 285/30R18 tire on a 18" x 10" rim has an overall dia of 24.7", 11" section (widest point) and a 10.2" tread width.
Compared with a 275/40R17 on a 17" x 9.5" rim that has an overall dia of 25.6", 10.9" section and a 9.8" tread width.
Between the two, wouldn't the 285/30R18 on the 18" x 10" be easier to fit properly (with appropriate offset)?
(specs were from Sumitomo HTRZ 3)
Would it be easier if we knew the offset needed for a given width with the overall diameter being kept as close to original?