87mgte;880397 said:*shits pants* Hooo-ly shit. lol Must have been invigorating. I guess if I had one I'd do the same thing, though. Ya know, just take it out for a little 0-120 run every morning to officially wake myself up before going to school.
turbodriz;881180 said:1000 are the cheapest way to get to 10sec. 160+hp to the rear wheel. wet weight 490pounds.
IJ.;880595 said:Poodles: So far most of the fast guys have been on Z's
KeithH;881196 said:
I don't know who this was or where they were but I have heard that the Supra in question was 100% bone stock at the time.
suprahero;880818 said:Offtopic a little, but I was wondering about my Nitto 555r's. I'm thinking about getting a set to run all the time and I know they're made for the track, but are they made to run 140mph on a short highway run? Does anyone have any knowledge of these tires?
IJ, I see your raising your hand in the back of the class.........what do you know about this?
BlackMKIII;864549 said:http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa60/BlackMKIII/Build/100_2285.jpg[img]
THAT fast. Calculated to 165 MPH.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BlackMKIII;879582]This was done with a 4:30 rear end, 245/40/R17 Tires, R154 transmission.
Verify that. :biglaugh:[/QUOTE]
158.4, which is quite fast for any car. You don't need an engine swap to do it either.
I rounded the tire size. You are still stock diameter, about 24.7". Tire makers often give out actual circumfrence of the tire. This makes me think of top speed test done on lane r ellis page. They couldn't get a car(modified) to go faster than a verifiable 156. They said it was bouncing off the rev limiter. The rev limiter will reach 166 or so in a 3.91 car with 6750 fuel cut of the 87-88(7M). Which gives weight to the top speed fuel cut devices sold by HKS. Your tach could be off by a slight amount also. You swapped all electronics and are not running stand alone are you?