I drive my girlfriends 95GT stang alot and it handles damn good (hardly any bodyroll)on nice flat pavement lol the littlist bump of uneven pavement will upset the soild rear axel and make it squrlly
gm = crap... they build their cars with a short lifespan in mind (as long as it'll hold together till the warrantee runs out, that's their only concern) IMHO toyota = much better qualitydababiboi786/supramaniac;908834 said:there is a 89 turbo supra w/ about 150,000 miles on it i wanna buy sooo bad but my dad thinks i should get a 95 v6 camaro. if i get the camaro im thinking of putting a ls1 engine in it. What do you guys think? (camaro has 90,000 miles on it)
zambini;910643 said:... and you know what those wah's sound like
redmaro;910281 said:In 1995 the V6 camaro only came out with a 3.4L engine, which is even slower. But they are reliable cars for daily driving(I owned one). Many Camaro V6 owners with the 3.4's engines have trouble braking into the 15's in the quarter(It takes allot of work.):aigo:
3.4L camaro Specs::biglaugh:
160hp at The crank
200Tq
They make all their peak toque at 3,600 RPM's
zambini;910643 said:i mean.. what are you gonna do when you get your v6 f body... give it exhaust? lol
'hey check this shit out man!!' BWAHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
... and you know what those wah's sound like
wiseco7mgt;913004 said:if moneys an issue how about a stock 7mgte into a ma61?shim the turbo and add an exhaust and a decent downpipe and you could get into the 13sec.?:biglaugh: