Rear seats can't possibly be 28 lbs. The whole bottom cushion could be lifted by Stephen Hawking. I will admit I have never lifted the rear seat-backs, but there's no way they're 14 lbs each..
tyang82;1835475 said:I like to have my interior. My car isn't a drag racing machine.
RazoE;1836631 said:Rear seats can't possibly be 28 lbs. The whole bottom cushion could be lifted by Stephen Hawking. I will admit I have never lifted the rear seat-backs, but there's no way they're 14 lbs each..
Poodles;1836665 said:Rear seat backs have a metal frame in them making them much heavier.
Not really something for the amateur, but if you're serious, this is the level of dedication to SERIOUSLY lose weight while maintaining the car's luxuries. Seam welding is a good idea too.destrux;1836696 said:You can also get out the hole saws and flange tool and take some metal out of the shell (if done correctly, this adds stiffness and strength due to the flanges around the hole). The bottom image here is the Opera S2000. Google it for more info... they went crazy with the lightening holes and dropped some serious pounds.
mjsn1;1836698 said:Instead of bothering yourself with the interior, and ending up with a rattling car, just work on the engine.
my car has about 400 HP and more upgrades are still coming, and i still have the stock wheels on. that's how i like my car.
destrux;1836744 said:Sure, power is easy, but everything else isn't.
Think about this...
A 2900 pound car with 290hp will be just as fast as a 3700 pound car with 370hp. Yeah, losing 800 pounds is harder and more expensive than gaining 80hp. The thing people don't think of is that dropping 27% of the car's weight (as in this example) is the same as upgrading your brakes, suspension, and tires to parts that are 27% better. If you already have that stuff upgraded to the best stuff, you're still that much better off than the guy with the full weight car who has the same parts as you. You also wear those parts out 27% slower during normal driving.
Another MkIII;1836786 said:I will agree that that weight reduction has its advantages, but it also has its place. Stripping the interior on a car used almost entirely on the street is rice as all hell. At the same time, doing nothing more than gutting your interior for a track car is a half assed effort that will save you at most, 200 pounds. On a 3500 pound car, that's not much compared to 200 pounds in a honda. Doing proper weight reduction (Lighter/smaller parts, weight reduction holes, etc) for the right reasons (A car that sees regular track use) is really the only way to do this without falling into the ricer category.
^My opinion.
-AM3
Another MkIII;1836786 said:I will agree that that weight reduction has its advantages, but it also has its place. Stripping the interior on a car used almost entirely on the street is rice as all hell. At the same time, doing nothing more than gutting your interior for a track car is a half assed effort that will save you at most, 200 pounds. On a 3500 pound car, that's not much compared to 200 pounds in a honda. Doing proper weight reduction (Lighter/smaller parts, weight reduction holes, etc) for the right reasons (A car that sees regular track use) is really the only way to do this without falling into the ricer category.
^My opinion.
-AM3
\thread? I think this sums it up.IJ.;1836865 said:If weight is important you chose the wrong car.... :nono:
The Mk3 is a Heffalump at best even stripped down to a noisy hot rattly PoS with none of the original creature comforts, conversely it's best feature is you can keep ALL in place and still smoke most of the cars on the road you come across when properly built.
Of course this means you need more than a $25 budget but this comes back to the wrong car statement...