taillight conversion

[ma70mkiii]

What do you guys think of the MKIV taillight conversion on a MKIII. I've seen a couple. I've thought about it but idk. Is it really worth the work?

 

[BlackMKIII]

Rice.

No.

:squint:

Also, wrong section.

 

[The1]

Congrats!? *shrugs*

 

[Dylan JZ]

what the..

 

[swaq]

Already been discussed many times. Bottom line is it looks worse and there's no reason to pretend to be a different car (or year, in this case).

 

[Clint]

:umno: :gotrice: : if you put them on your car it will blow its head gasket! ::bhg:: :rofl:

 

[OneJoeZee]

disgusting

 

[ms07s]

Dosen't flow with the body lines so no. Wonder how much bondo is on the back of that supra?

 

[Dylan JZ]

I bought an mk3 because I wanted an mk3.. I personally dont like much about the mk4, including the fact that I think it looks like a space ship. You wont see any mk4 parts on my car that's for sure, other than maybe some 2j upgrades.

Just wish this car wasn't 20 years old. and lmao @ onejoe and zerocool's comments.

 

[BlackMKIII]

The only thing I want my car to have in common with a MKIV (aside from RWD, 2 doors, "Supra," etc) is two digits of the engine designation. AND THAT'S ALL!!!

 

[EvoLuTioN]

Get a MK4 and stop pretending

 

[kwnate]

I'm not going to flame you for asking, if you do it though... I won't be silent :aigo:

 

[shaeff]

don't like it. (no, it's not my car...) though, i suppose it wouldn't look terrible if they were blacked out so they matched the contour of the car.

but honestly, the shape of the actual lights when illuminated don't match our cars. you should learn to embrace the semi-boxy shape of the mk3.

 

[ERA]

MKIV tailights belong on, well, a MKIV. Was browsing the Craigslist:
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/car/473335179.html
It just doesn't flow..

Probably the only MKIV my MKIII would ever see is maybe a set of turbo wheels.

 

[LilMissMkIII]

fugly

 

[Ds650rida]

its like a fat chick wearing a belly shirt, just doesn't work.

 

[suprastanger507mgte]

Already been discussed many times. Bottom line is it looks worse and there's no reason to pretend to be a different car (or year, in this case).

Not a good answer comparing it to pretending to be like another car or year. Its no different than putting a 1JZ or a 2JZ engine in the MKIII.

BTw: In that picture, it looks pretty nice. in MY opinion. if you like it, go for it. Just make sure whoever does the conversion does a top notch job as in the example you have posted.

 

[CDNSUPRA]

I'm leaning more towards no, but that's why I have my Supra, and you have yours. Do what you want, and what you like. Not what others like, it is YOUR car.

 

[claytonio disastro]

and this is in the wrong section. someone move this please

 

[Wills7MGTE]

Everyone on here acts like they hate mk4's, well truth be told you buy an mk3 because you cannot afford the mk4 and everyone with an mk3 has an inferiority complex about it, don't pretend ya don't we all own em we all know LOL. I think mk4's look good, they are much better engineered. Look at our high HP guys, we are stoked to make 500 or 600 or even 800 and fact is thats what noobs can make with 10k and an MK4, they handle better, they are lighter, they are more reliable, whats not to be envious of.

2jz or not it's still an mk3

P.S. THOSE TAILIGHTS LOOK LIKE ASS ON THE MK3