uh....dude, seriously....just because your 17 doesn't mean you can't get 20 years for having sex with a minor. 17 is as good as 18, or even 20 under the law....plus the 22 years old probbly knows a thing or two more then the younger one.
ma71supraturbo said:17 is what, a Junior in highschool? 14 is a freshman... Maybe I was just in a redneck area, but that was pretty common where I grew up... Guys are generally less intellectually mature than girls anyway.
Now if you were 22 and dating a 14 year old.... then I'd call you chester the molester...
on a serious note ... I agree w/ you 100%... pretty much what i was gonna sayOneJoeZee said:I don't see how 17 is good for either of those ages. when I was 17 I wasn't ready for a 22 year old. I'm 20. 3 years is alot of time to grow up...
a 14yr old isnt gonna know wtf a real relationship is about. on the same note, you probably dont either. no offense, just how it is.
Ma70.Ent said:THIS TOPIC IS WORTHLESS WITHOUT PICS!
or, on a serious note...
PIIBTB
or...
forget them both. 14 year old = wtf -_-;; and 22 year old? You sure she likes you?
MKIII N00b said:very sure. i have come to the conclusion that the 22 would be a better choice. i just want to see where this goes.
Dachande said:17 and in college...you must have skipped a grade or something. doogie howzer was what..15 in college?
MKIII N00b said:actually no 17 is not a junior more like a college freshman
HellsLegion said:I knew some too. =/
swaq said:I entered college at 19 and I was never held back. My fiancee turned 18 two months into her freshman year at college. The norm is about mid 18, I believe.
entertainment value...MKIII N00b said:and if this is the stupidest thread ever then why are you even looking at it.