flubyux2 said:500hp or 500tq?
imo, hp rating is irrelavant... unless you mean like 450tq when you say 500tq?
gilberjj said:There is a guy on SM running a 4200lb custom pp. Im not sure he wants everyone to know what he's got, but he'll chime in if he wants. Its connected with an unsprung sintered iron disk. He told me he's been running the clutch for a year with no master cylinder or throw out bearing failures. He also stated that its good for over 1000 rwtq! Not my kind of clutch, but it can be done!
dbsupra90 said:i dont like spec. the clutch or the people.
i wouldnt be surprised if cost is around $1 per 1ft/lb
drjonez said:agreed.
what we need is a cost-effective multi-plate option....then again, why blow all that $$ on the R154 just to blow it up?
Where did you get that info?flubyux2 said:lol. TKO's arent rated any higher than an R154... isnt that just a 3550 or something? i mean, i know people who run 10's on stock mustang V8 T5's but tahts in a car that weighs 1000lbs less than ours. just cuz itll survive in a fox-body doesnt mean we can do the same thing.
and, having a clutch that will hold the torque will just make fixing the driveline that much easier.
instead of having to replace a clutch AND a tranny, you can just do the tranny... especially since trannies cost Less than even most Single-disc clutches that would be rated to hold the minimum amount of torque required to kill the R154.
even now... spending $500 for a clutch that will hold enough power to kill a $400 tranny, were at that point Jonezy