Ckanderson said:no front pics=cant prove who was driving, amirite?
You can never prove who was driving with these things. It's the owner of the vehicle's responsibility.
Pay the fine, and forget about it.
Ckanderson said:no front pics=cant prove who was driving, amirite?
something like that for your state?Drivers Who Block Their Face Are Never Cited
A driver who obscures his face while transiting an intersection is also not subject to automated enforcement. Without a clear photograph of the driver, no citation can be issued The California Vehicle Code (CVC Section 210) requires a "clear photograph of a vehicle's license plate and the driver of the vehicle" for an automated enforcement citation to be issued.
if there is no conviction, how can they fine you? fucking gayness.(4) An imposition of liability under the Section shall not be deemed a conviction as an operator
and shall not be made part of the operating record upon whom such liability is imposed.
Im not going to fight it...its just going to make more problems......thats if i do get a ticket(which i prolly will)Jeff Lange said:That's going to be very dependent on where you live Poodles.
In Alberta, we do not have front license plates, as such only the rear of your car can be photographed. The person who owns the vehicle is responsible for the use of the vehicle, even if they're not driving. As such, a ticket is issued to that person, however since it cannot be confirmed they were driving, there are no points awarded to their license.
Poodles said:doubt it as 5 over is well in the area of speedo calibration..
wait and see if you get a letter in the mail, I doubt it...
Jeff Lange said:Toyota's spec only allows for error on the side of caution (going slower than what the speedo says), and even then at that low of a speed the error is only a max of 3.5-4mph.