Well said with the Paul Harvey video man. Thoughts on red light running? I see it way too much for my own comfort here, if I'm first in line at a light, I'll usually wait a couple seconds before going it's that bad around here...
Don't do it??te72;1695795 said:Thoughts on red light running?
That's a good idea. Again, there are alot of circumstances that account for whether I cite them for it. If you haven't been able to pick up on it yet, I'm a pretty laid back guy. If I'm stopping someone for running a red light, it's because they really ran it. I don't mean they were in the intersection when it turned red. I only stop someone if it was red before their front wheels crossed the crosswalk.te72;1695795 said:I see it way too much for my own comfort here, if I'm first in line at a light, I'll usually wait a couple seconds before going it's that bad around here...
Our dept. equipped two patrol cars with the plate readers, in order to test them. When they worked, they were okay. We found alot of stolen cars with them, but, we couldn't justify spending the money on them for what they did. They also made the car look ridiculous. When a picture was taken, the only thing the Officer could see was the picture of the license plate. If it came back as a stolen car, it would give an alert. From there we had to manually verify, by running the plate like we normally do. When the WACIC (Washington Crime Information Center) and NCIC (National Crime Information Center) results confirmed it was stolen, then we could stop the vehicle.Cz.;1696365 said:Do you know anything about automated license plate reading systems? I know there are a lot of departments that are using that technology now, including in Washington. I can’t seem to find any real details on how much data is being collected and held, but I was curious if you knew how extensively the system is being used.
I honestly think it's ridiculous for an honest person to worry about it. I'm sure several members here would disagree, but the way I see it, does a person really have an expectation of privacy when they are in public? I don't care if someone is tracking my everyday movements while I'm out in public.Cz.;1696365 said:I guess for a more pressing question, as a cop, how do you feel about these automated systems that can be basically used to create gigantic databases that save a car's plates, location, date, time, etc indiscriminately all day every day which can then be used over a length of time to basically to map out and track a person's movements for however long the system has been in place?
You're right, we are lacking details. The thought in my head is probably like everyone elses'. Why couldn't a cop, or anyone really, control an 8 year old, even with a stick? That Officer probably thought pepper spray was his best option given the circumstances at that time. Do I think it was excessive? Not really. Sure, the Officer could have gone hands on with the kid. Maybe the cop didn't want to take a chance on getting hit. I know, he's 8. But I don't want to get hit if I can avoid it. So we've established he doesn't want to get hit. So now we climb the use of force ladder. We started with Officer presence. That didn't work. Moved to verbal commands, which didn't work. Pepper spray was the next step. I'm not sure if anyone reading this has been pepper sprayed, but it sucks. Imagine the pain of taking a cumshot to the eye from the devil. However, it only irritates the senses. It's a far better cry than an Officer tasing the kid, or whipping ass with his asp/baton.ForcedTorque;1696409 said:How do you feel about tonights story of a Colorado LEO pepper spraying an 8 year old student? I'm not sure how I feel about it myself. My first thought is, why can't a trained cop take care of an 8 year old without such measures. But, I don't know all of the details either.
Oh I'm sure the parent(s) will sue. And as absurd as it would be, probably win. It's absurd because to win a judgement, you have to prove some sort of damages, whether it be material, or psychological. The mother, who seems oblivious to the fact her son has had the cops deal with her son twice before, should be the one to be punished. I'm not a judge and don't hand out sentences, but she should have to at minimum pay for the damage her son did to the school property.ForcedTorque;1696409 said:AND.........do you feel like (right or wrong) this child's parents will win the almost certain law suit? If it were my child, I would definitely consult a lawyer. I don't always advocate law suits for everything that happens, because I know that no matter how much a settlement is paid, it is ultimately the public that pays the money.
A little sideline on that topic. IMO privacy is one of those things that society as a whole is evolving away from. And I'm not talking about losing it by law - the younger generations don't appear to value privacy. Most of the -20 generation puts their whole life on display, through youtube, facebook, twitter, and photobucket.Dunckel;1696503 said:I honestly think it's ridiculous for an honest person to worry about it. I'm sure several members here would disagree, but the way I see it, does a person really have an expectation of privacy when they are in public? I don't care if someone is tracking my everyday movements while I'm out in public.
Dunckel;1696503 said:Don't do it??
That's a good idea. Again, there are alot of circumstances that account for whether I cite them for it. If you haven't been able to pick up on it yet, I'm a pretty laid back guy. If I'm stopping someone for running a red light, it's because they really ran it. I don't mean they were in the intersection when it turned red. I only stop someone if it was red before their front wheels crossed the crosswalk.
GrimJack;1696508 said:the under 20 crew just doesn't care.
Dunkel said:I'm not sure if anyone reading this has been pepper sprayed, but it sucks. Imagine the pain of taking a cumshot to the eye from the devil.