Going next wednesday! Got a full fresh motor with the compression bumped to around 9.7:1
Should be mid 50's out we'll see if it will do a low 11
Should be mid 50's out we'll see if it will do a low 11
Nick M;1767792 said:You will go well over 400rwhp with the added comprssion.
te72;1767809 said:Curious question, is a 10.99 possible without sacrificing too much comfort? I.e., stripping interior, sound deadening, etc... .
Nick M;1767863 said:That is purely subjective.
That is what I was getting at. I drove a 5.0 Mustang for a while. And while it was a 1990 GT, there wasn't anything Grand about it.te72;1768513 said:True. My definition is "could someone who's old enough to appreciate the comfort enough to NEED it, use the car as a daily driver?" If the car is completely gutted, hard riding, noisy, and hot, it's probably fine for a younger driver, but once you get older, you start to appreciate how comfortable a Supra is when left alone.
Any plans for head work? I know Tyler ran a 10.67 with the R154 and stock head, definitely more power to be had for him. If I remember correctly you have a modified stock exhaust manifold with external wastegate? Any reason you haven't made a tubular manifold yet, other than time?Devin LeBlanc;1768516 said:Stock head and cams, however the cams have been degree'd to help with top end power.
Haha, good point sir, good point. My 2001 SS wasn't exactly what I'd call "super sporty" either.Nick M;1768895 said:That is what I was getting at. I drove a 5.0 Mustang for a while. And while it was a 1990 GT, there wasn't anything Grand about it.
Devin LeBlanc;1769190 said:How many dollars per HP are you willing to spend? That's why I see no point to go with a FFIM and Tubular exhaust manifold.[/QUOTE
Exactly.......:evil2:
Devin LeBlanc;1769190 said:How many dollars per HP are you willing to spend? That's why I see no point to go with a FFIM and Tubular exhaust manifold.