DavidBaustert;1215279 said:I'm choosing not to run ISC for the moment being.
easternguy2005;1215289 said:Do you think you'll have even boost in all the cylinders ?
92nsx;1215292 said:Can I ask why not? Dosent it ever get cold in Ohio? What about first start up on a brisk fall day?
I just ask why because it took me around 25 min. to make mine, not log at all. Super easy to make and easy to add not rather then once the FFIM is on the 7M.
Pic of mine
89turbotoy;1215423 said:it sucks Dave! lol jk looks good now make me one.
DavidBaustert;1215416 said:It's been virtural flowed in a 3D modeling program. There was less than 2% deviance between runners when virtural flowed with water.
Not really sure what you mean by this? Further explanation would probably yield a better answer.Doward;1215526 said:Parameters used?
PM me for all pricing and ordering of intake manifolds. I never really intended on making/selling these but I could for some build funds.suprafanatic;1215656 said:how much for one to be made?
DavidBaustert;1216129 said:Not really sure what you mean by this? Further explanation would probably yield a better answer.
Adjuster;1215842 said:Looks much like Ron R's design for the short runner.
I love they way they turn out, and simplify the pipes issue, but I will not give up AC to have one.
(I know Ron R. makes a long runner version that retains AC and relocates the alternator down slightly.. But right now, it's not a consideration for my build or budget.)
Besids, the car should be able to make mid 600rwhp easy with the stock setup.
jt2ma71;1216306 said:So,You didn't know I now make short runner version without having to ditch the AC? You don't have to give up the AC
92nsx;1216296 said:Parameters used when it was virtural flowed in the 3D modeling program.
jt2ma71;1216305 said:So,You didn't know I now make short runner version without having to ditch the AC?