RMM = Repeat My Mods
Everyone has that damn wing, I'd stick with the stock wing to stand out LOL
Everyone has that damn wing, I'd stick with the stock wing to stand out LOL
MkIII front end on a MkIV
- Thread starter Orion ZyGarian
- Start date
Poodles;1245400 said:
I understand what you mean but thats like saying most people have the 3 piece 89+ rear wing so you should change it to a xyz wing because of it. If it looks good/better I would personally not care how many people do it.
yeah your right, the acronym doesn't work. I lose.
I do think the mk3 has better stock body work/ground effects 89+ then the mk4 does. I actually prefer a stock body Mk3 to any kitted example i have seen. But with the correct body parts the mk4 takes the cake, Ridox=:drool:
I do think the mk3 has better stock body work/ground effects 89+ then the mk4 does. I actually prefer a stock body Mk3 to any kitted example i have seen. But with the correct body parts the mk4 takes the cake, Ridox=:drool:
Yeah, they got the lines along the bottom of the car right (the MKII for example is too high in the front and rear), but the Pre-89 front looks a bit better from the side in some ways.
I know I'm gonna get flamed for this, but the MKIV looks like a chick car, just like the eclipse. MKIII doesn't...
Keep in mind I want a Supra of every generation (well, maybe not a MKI) eventually...
I know I'm gonna get flamed for this, but the MKIV looks like a chick car, just like the eclipse. MKIII doesn't...
Keep in mind I want a Supra of every generation (well, maybe not a MKI) eventually...
I think they really just messed up the bottom black plastic on the mk4. The way it is curved down on each piece towards the rear of the car just looks wrong.
so now lets see a MKIV with a stock 3 piece wing from a mark three.
Just kidding.We don't need any more mix matching.
Just kidding.We don't need any more mix matching.
Although the look of the Mk4 has really grown on me over the years, it still looks like a surprised cartoon catfish with a really big ass.
this thread reminds me of the fugly el camino. they were just confused when they made it.
picture a dozen hillbillies sitting around drinking beer and setting shit on fire. they had billys' old truck and johnys' moms' neighbors' car in the back yard.
one day billy had a bright idea. he said, "lets put that there truck and this here car together". once they finally sobered up, they realized they had possibly made the ugliest car on earth.
that is how I believe the el camino came about.
is it a car? is it a truck? we have no clue.
trying to mix a mk3 with an mk4 is wrong, just like trying to mix a car and a truck.
why the hell would you want to butcher a great looking car?
picture a dozen hillbillies sitting around drinking beer and setting shit on fire. they had billys' old truck and johnys' moms' neighbors' car in the back yard.
one day billy had a bright idea. he said, "lets put that there truck and this here car together". once they finally sobered up, they realized they had possibly made the ugliest car on earth.
that is how I believe the el camino came about.
is it a car? is it a truck? we have no clue.
trying to mix a mk3 with an mk4 is wrong, just like trying to mix a car and a truck.
why the hell would you want to butcher a great looking car?
Last edited:
I love those Mr.magoo headlights! I would have to say the Mk4 looks the best from the back though. they got the rear end perfect from the factory. I am a big fan overall of the body, the mk4 does a good job of keeping a curvy body which isn't just a blob but has definition.
Last edited:
kabanimk3supra;1247408 said:
The plan is to buy a wrecked N/A and graft a MA71 front end on it, 7M and all. 2Js get put in MkIIIs all the time (for perfectly good reasons)...why not vice versa?
Hey man, after seeing a 1J swapped Turbo A, sometimes you just have to say "enough is enough" :biglaugh:
