MKivSupra_Rob said:
With the speed of both lights turning on and the average human response time we're talking nanoseconds here.
bub not sure where you are getting facts. It takes roughly about a couple ms for an incandenct light bulb to come to full brightness. if it takes the LED 1 ms to come on that gives a person a 3 ms time which is right around the limit of 2 ms reaction time average.
MKivSupra_Rob said:
It may be, but the cost of a 2$ bulb compared to all of those LED's, not to mention how easy it is to just change a bulb, where as the LED's are annother story
actually not that much differet if built with replacement in mind
Most of the ones you see are replaced as a unit, so no quick release of the LED.
MKivSupra_Rob said:
Sure they use ~90% less energy, but there are 2 bulbs on when running, where as there are many many more LED's, so 90% or not, its using roughly the same.
actually they run on 5vdc and its amerage draw per each one is a hell of a lot less. It is NOT roughly the same, as a matter of fact you would need three times the amount of LED to consume the same amount of power.
MKivSupra_Rob said:
too bright? no such thing, you are either seen or not.
MKivSupra_Rob said:
IMO anyways, sure LED's have their purks but these guys are using way to many and its going to be blinding. The amount of energy your alternator makes easily makes up for a few tail lights. Just the cost of buying htose online/making your own alone isnt really worth it to have some blinding tail lights. Evenly dispursed would look cool but in those pics they look orange and VERY un evenly dispursed
cost is actually cheap, as each led cost about 10 cents a pop. 1 dollar for the luxeons which require less of to make (see Infiniti and Nissan for Useage). Keep in mind with the alternator that it is a feedback based unit, ie if the voltage drop it will increase the field which increases drag on the motor