The compressor polishing is a great price, here one of our big suppliers offers it at a converted to USD $108!
dbsupra90 said:william-
850+ ship eh? how does 750 w/ the gt40 cover and 68 t4 turbine sound?
ck-
thanks man!
williamb82 said:i want the gt cover if possible, thats why i asked about the gt4088 with a 0.68 turbine(the 0.68 turbine is sold by precision, thats who i got the part number from). im thinking of just selling mine and buying a larger one. though the gt4067 seems a lil pricey for a non bband also has a larger turbine then i want, and yes, i need a t4 flange turbine. so how much is the real gt4088? cheapest ive seen so far is like $850 + shipping but it comes wit hthe 0.94 or 1.05 turbine so the 0.68 would be bough separate. which i may have the turbine already, i told my folks i wanted it for xmas, so i guess i need prices with the 0.68 and wit hthe std turbine housing as well.
BlackDevilSupra said:Opting for a .68 A/R turbine housing for a GT4088 or larger compressor wheel GT type turbo I consider a bad idea. Note, the GT4088 is 56 trim, which indicates the compressor wheel is 88mm (exducer) and 64.7mm (inducer). Also, the flow efficiency, volume (mass), and power delivery of this turbo is far superior when compared to other "T" type turbo's of relatively equivalent size. Therefore, there is a substantial risk of part throttle surging induced by the small A/R turbine housing. My previous SP63 was a surge monster when it was coupled with a .68 A/R.
The advantage of the "new" GT type turbo's, standard journal bearing or ball bearing, is its excellent flow pattern, so don't consider limiting and choking the turbo's flow pattern and performance by undersizing the housings.
HTH
dbsupra90 said:hi howard-
i dont think there is a problem running the gt40 w/ a 68. it is bascially the same size as a sp67 and by no means does a 68 choke that down. sean dyno'd his car w/ the 68 then the 81 and saw very little difference. meaning the exh housing even at 30psi and 644rw it was not a restriction. granted he does have a 4" dp, but the housing was not a choke point.
as far as surging, he only runs idle and wot haha. but the gt40 does have an anti surge housing fwiw.
BlackDevilSupra said:Opting for a .68 A/R turbine housing for a GT4088 or larger compressor wheel GT type turbo I consider a bad idea. Note, the GT4088 is 56 trim, which indicates the compressor wheel is 88mm (exducer) and 64.7mm (inducer). Also, the flow efficiency, volume (mass), and power delivery of this turbo is far superior when compared to other "T" type turbo's of relatively equivalent size. Therefore, there is a substantial risk of part throttle surging induced by the small A/R turbine housing. My previous SP63 was a surge monster when it was coupled with a .68 A/R.
The advantage of the "new" GT type turbo's, standard journal bearing or ball bearing, is its excellent flow pattern, so don't consider limiting and choking the turbo's flow pattern and performance by undersizing the housings.
HTH
dbsupra90 said:dave talked to precision this am about a/r sizing on the gt40. this is what they said-
I talked with PTE about this and here is the skinny. They do offer a .68 a/r T4 turbine on the GT4082 which has a smaller turbine wheel. They sometimes put the smaller turbine wheel on the GT4067 and have a .68a/r on that as well. But the GT4088 has the larger turbine wheel, and they do not have a .68a/r for that, only the .81a/r. He said they could make a custom GT4088 with the smaller turbine wheel and .68 housing, that will cost extra, he didn't tell me how much.
Chris-Supra said:hmm, the .81 gt4088 is a little more spool that I would like. Think the gt4082 with a .81 would get 500+rwhp on pump gas?
williamb82 said:according to garretts stie they are both 77mm diameter turbine wheels. anyhow, id rather have the smaller wheel wit the 0.68 housing. lmk how much extra it would be. thnx.
dbsupra90 said:well, it will depend on other mods and what your idea of safe boost is for pump gas. it should be in the ball park tho.