I almost peed myself reading this Craigs List Ad

OneJoeZee

Retired Post Whore
Mar 30, 2005
5,721
0
0
38
aboard the Argama
st2b;943715 said:
I will never sell my car for under $6,000. People need to start selling their MkIII's for what they're worth. If you think about it, if everyone gradually starting selling their MkIII's for more and more, we would see a point in time where everyone started valuing these cars more and more. What makes them worth 2-4,000? But selling you're Supra that cheap just means I get a 8k car for 3k. You're loss.

If you believe your extremely nice/clean mark 3 is worth half it's valve, sell it to someone who values it more than you, simple.

Just my word, everyone is entitled to their opinion,
Matt

Why is your specific car worth 6k?
 

st2b

Banned
Sep 15, 2006
589
0
0
Versailles (Lex) Ky
www.myspace.com
OneJoeZee;943738 said:
Why is your specific car worth 6k?

Because the Supra is an amazing car, paint less than a year old, new rims, 100% tread on tires, over 2,000$ of maintenance work just done, paid 2,000$ for the car as it is, the motor has 70,000 miles on it, clean title, no body damage, lots of engine parts polished, no problems with the motor at all, new plugs, fuel filter and all that. The seats are nearly perfect for a 21 year old car, original paperwork and such misc things. Brand new struts all the way around, compression is amazing, new headgasket. Fresh transmission fluid, oil, coolant. It's the sport edition, so power seats, headlight washers, and TEMS. Looks beautiful, is fun to drive, and be a passenger in, I get looks everywhere. Everything in it works, A/C is cold, new taillights, not a spec of rust and has been garaged since 1987.

I feel my car is worth more than more than a totaled 350Z, but hey, you might, and if that's how you valve your Supra, fine.
 

Supracentral

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
10,542
10
36
st2b;943857 said:
I was speaking to everyone who, if their Supra was for sale, would sell it for cheap.

You missed the point. He's poking at your grammatical failings.

6492105.gif


You said "You're loss"

You're is the contraction of You Are.

So you technically said "You are loss." which doesn't make a bit of sense.

What you were looking for is the word your, which indicates possession.

When you mutilate the language, your point sometimes get lost.
 

st2b

Banned
Sep 15, 2006
589
0
0
Versailles (Lex) Ky
www.myspace.com
Supracentral;943859 said:
You missed the point. He's poking at your grammatical failings.

6492105.gif


You said "You're loss"

You're is the contraction of You Are.

So you technically said "You are loss." which doesn't make a bit of sense.

What you were looking for is the word your, which indicates possession.

When you mutilate the language, your point sometimes get lost.

Hahahaha, yeah I just noticed that. bettar tahn typin like this yo!!1
Human error my bad, Thanks SupraCentral!