drjonez said:dead on. too bad that's far too deep for most here to understand....
:biglaugh: maybe when im older
drjonez said:dead on. too bad that's far too deep for most here to understand....
juhanis said:i've tried using the 4.30, not for me, i dont like the higher freeway rpms. it now collects dust among other crap sitting on the side of my house. besides, that's not going to help the ever present traction issue that i have too.
grsupra87 said:Are they LSD??
drjonez said:
outofstep said:Like I said, wider tires will pretty much always give you better traction. Just because it isn't a longitudinal contact patch, doesn't mean anything. Well, it just means it's not as "efficient" for forward acceleration. But more surface area is more surface area.
As to what is the best a wider tire with not as soft as a compound, or a skinnier one with a stickier compound. I don’t know. I don’t know where the advantage of surface area vs higher coefficient of friction will cross. I can tell you that a 235 slick will hook better than a 315 regular street tire.
How about this; just put some nice 275+ sticky tires out back and you’ll most likely be good.
No real reason to debate at what point size vs compound will yield better results. Just go big and sticky.
grsupra87 said:Are they LSD??
gixxer750 said:actually, I'm getting better gas mileage with the 4.30s. The engine has better power at 3.5k off boost than it does at 2800 of boost. Apparently, not as much strain on the motor.