gt35r

p5150

ASE and FAA A&P Certified
Mar 31, 2005
1,176
0
36
Central Idaho
wingman said:
so if someone were to want 500+whp on pump gas (91), and upwards of 600 on C16, the GT4067R would be the best bet in terms of lag time in comparison to power goals, or am I still slightly unedjumacated?

I dont want to sound like a know it all, but I think you might have the nomenclature of the GT40 a bit mixed.

In your nomenclature, you refer to it as the GT4067. Everywhere else that I have seen refers to the GT40 as either an 82 or 88 mm wheel. IE: GT4082 or GT4088. Are you referencing a different part of the impeller? Are you using the "67" to refer to the AR of the turbine housing?
 

p5150

ASE and FAA A&P Certified
Mar 31, 2005
1,176
0
36
Central Idaho
OK I see. You are measuring the front of the impeller instead of the aft portion. Im willing to bet that the back of the 67 measures 88mm. Otherwise known as the GT4088
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
Been trying to pin down some exact info on this but it's like the 3040 nightmare all over again!

4082 = 58mm inducer
3540R = 61mm inducer
4088 = 64mm inducer
40R = 65mm inducer
4067R = 67mm inducer

Add to this a lot of Exducer sizes and you get many different combinations as I mentioned the 4067R in theory is a great match for the 7M if it's let rev.