Do you believe the Supra (MK3) will become a collectors car over time?

Status
Not open for further replies.

pparrigo

India Delta OneZero Tango
Feb 12, 2008
115
0
0
37
WNY
Yeah, but what do you define as cheap? Yes, they are cheap to buy now, but they weren't cheap to buy new. All other things being equal, you could buy an E-type for less...

To buy my '89 new today would cost about $41000 w.r.t. inflation ($24700 in '89).

That, while not outlandish, is certainly not cheap. A '69 E-type Jaguar ($5xxx in '69) would cost a mere $32500, despite the fact that they only made ~73000 of them) Now, I realize that the rarity factor and the prestige of the jaguar badge affects current market value, but it's just something to think about.


I think that what we are going to see is a dramatic value increase for the Mk3 in 10-15 years. For example, our 240z (Including all Z variants through the 280z, over 600000 were made, far more than the Mk3). A few years ago, a nice 240z would fetch maybe $5000. Today, according to NADA, it's worth over $21000, with an average one running about $12000. My father never ever saw this coming, and he has been following the Zs since he sold his old 240 in the 70s.
 

LilMissMkIII

That Aussie Chick
Aug 18, 2006
4,110
0
0
40
Aussie Land
Meh, I don't care if it does or not... I don't own my Supra because I want it to become a collectors' item and be worth a shit load.

I bought the car knowing it would cost me ten-fold in maintenance and mods than the purchase price.

I *do* like the fact however that in a few years, I can put historic rego plates on her!
 

JDMMA70

Active Member
Dec 4, 2006
2,550
0
36
Houston
Man your 89 was cheaper than my 88. Window sticker for my 88 was $28,985.00


I see it going the way of the old datsun z's cult classic
 

pparrigo

India Delta OneZero Tango
Feb 12, 2008
115
0
0
37
WNY
JDMMA70;1226616 said:
Man your 89 was cheaper than my 88. Window sticker for my 88 was $28,985.00


I see it going the way of the old datsun z's cult classic


I only figured it out using MSRP, no doubt sticker price was higher across the board. My 89 would likely have been around that- the only option it doesn't have was the automatic...


I also agree with the sentiment of not caring whether or not it becomes a collector. I love it to pieces (unfortunately that is also literal...).
 

Sside

Member
May 20, 2008
554
0
16
Houston
LilMissMkIII;1226615 said:
Meh, I don't care if it does or not... I don't own my Supra because I want it to become a collectors' item and be worth a shit load.

I bought the car knowing it would cost me ten-fold in maintenance and mods than the purchase price.

I *do* like the fact however that in a few years, I can put historic rego plates on her!

I 2nd that! Oh yeah...
 

supradjza80

Mr. Formula SAE
Apr 24, 2007
782
0
0
39
Appleton, WI
www.uwracing.com
I have seen pristine MK3's with no modifications go for 15k plus (thing is most are in shit condition...)

I forsee the nice ones being collectors items. I think most of you think there are more A70's then there actually are.

MA70 Feb. 1985 (pre-production) - Jan 1993 = 162,455 units http://www.supramania.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-55534.html

So while there may be 15 times more then the mk4 which had production of about 11-12000 units (only 4800 6spd turbos) i still think the desirable turbo models will start to appreciate relatively soon.
 

91T breezen'

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
Apr 4, 2005
1,149
0
0
NOYFB!
MkIII's will never be collector cars.:nono: My 91 turbo sunroof, was almost 30K brand new!:aigo: It was bone stock (save for a mhg and ARP's) when I bought it for $4800.00, three years ago. Alot of compromises by Toyota to appeal to a larger market, with an overweight, optioned-out Grand Touring coupe, ruined it's possible sports car collectible future. Combine that with a very poor engine choice, and the eventual release of the MkIV:icon_razz...well, you get the picture!
 

supra1008

Active Member
May 2, 2007
1,179
0
36
Philadelphia
Yea I don't think the mkIII will be a collector either. Maybe the MKII or MKIV. I know one guy with a bone stock MKIII with less than 5000 original miles on it. I doubt even that one will be come a collector. I also agree with the others... I got mine because of the looks and the potential.
 

pogoism9

1UZ for me!
May 18, 2007
367
0
0
45
fredericksburg, va
Until everyone realizes that they aren't race cars and stops modding the piss out of them just so they can beat a Civic, no they won't be viewed as collector cars. If I were a collector, and I ran across a mint looking MK3, say 10 years from now, and I popped the hood and there was a 1JZ in there I would slap the piss out of someone. A Hemi 'Cuda from the 70s isn't worth shit if someone swapped a 390 into it.
 

SupraMario

I think it was the google
Mar 30, 2005
3,467
6
38
38
The Farm
IJ.;1226409 said:
Pristine mint condition yes Hacked up turds we see here not a chance in hell.

Im sure you could have picked a better word than hacked, as I recall yours has seen the saw and torch more than a few times :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:

pogoism9;1226865 said:
Until everyone realizes that they aren't race cars and stops modding the piss out of them just so they can beat a Civic, no they won't be viewed as collector cars. If I were a collector, and I ran across a mint looking MK3, say 10 years from now, and I popped the hood and there was a 1JZ in there I would slap the piss out of someone. A Hemi 'Cuda from the 70s isn't worth shit if someone swapped a 390 into it.

Why 1jz? They came in these cars? LOL
 

1987mk3

New Member
Dec 23, 2008
95
0
0
mosinee
got a 1987 supra and it considered a collectors car...i think as long as your car is 20 years old or older its a collectors car
 

Moy

It's broken...
Aug 6, 2008
2,432
0
36
Beach Park, IL
D34DC311;1226933 said:
Why 1jz? They came in these cars? LOL

They came in JZA70's, not MA70's with 1JZ swaps. Like I said before, a legal/authentic/stateside JZA70 in pristine/stock condition (if it were ever to happen) would possibly qualify as a collector car.

1987mk3;1226942 said:
got a 1987 supra and it considered a collectors car...i think as long as your car is 20 years old or older its a collectors car

Not quite... 20+ years can qualify it for antique vehicle status, not collector car.
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
D34DC311;1226933 said:
Im sure you could have picked a better word than hacked, as I recall yours has seen the saw and torch more than a few times :biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh::biglaugh:



Why 1jz? They came in these cars? LOL

Never EVER said my car was a "nice" example of an MA70 Mario.....
(the difference is everything in my car works as well as stock if not better)

Mine is a pig that I don't hesitate to hack into if needed, I don't think I've ever owned a car that could be considered "collectable to me they're all "just cars".

I stand by my statement 100% ;)
 

wiseco7mgt

dirty mechanic
Aug 12, 2007
811
0
0
queensland
Who knows whether they will be , only time will tell. I even doubt my turbo-A will be because they never really ever did much in the racing circles due to poor backing by toyota.
Ian's right about wankers cutting there cars up.Seems the next generation wants to cut the shite out of the guards and the bonnets and add stupid wings and gay ass flares to try and look like something there not. The shape of the ma70 is great how it is, just lower it a bit and add wheels and nice paint.Keep the batmobile experiments for the Hyundai excels...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.