rakkasan said:
why?
rakkasan said:
possible...but if it's intercepting signals i don't see why it can't. heck, the eman + MAFT pro can advance....
should be interesting to see how the AEM thing would handle the retardo multiplex setup....
AEM (Piggyback) Fuel & Ignition Controller
- Thread starter MK3Brent
- Start date
why?
possible...but if it's intercepting signals i don't see why it can't. heck, the eman + MAFT pro can advance....
should be interesting to see how the AEM thing would handle the retardo multiplex setup....
No, but I'd like to control it at different boost levels per RPM.
But it doesn't seem to advance, only retard? Hrmm.
But it doesn't seem to advance, only retard? Hrmm.
Makes tuning the car harder when the stock ecu overrides the piggyback....drjonez said:
drjonez said:
True indeed, I didn't think about that...
nosechunks said:
sure would. an extra 10 degrees or so until 2 psi or so makes for fantastic response. YMMV.
Well doesnt the maf-t pro have target A/F. where you set what A/F ratio you want and the maf-t targets that. if i read correctly, the f/ic doesnt have that feature nor is it currently compatable with a wide band input, though it seems it may be able to in the future with a firm ware update.
BTW good info on it http://forum.aempower.com/forum/index.php/topic,19885.0.html
BTW good info on it http://forum.aempower.com/forum/index.php/topic,19885.0.html
againstdawall06 said:
yups. the MAFT pro can do that @ WOT and part throttle. the difference is that the AEM manipulates the injectors directly whereas the MAFT pro is scaling the AFM input to the ECU.
Doc, any word on whether the MAFT-pro might get direct injector control down the line?
That would seriously kick ass.
That would seriously kick ass.
Doward said:
yeah, that would pretty much rule. unfortunately, it's not possible w/the current hardware. i'll check and see what's in the cards for the next device....if there is one.
You know, I think the boys (Bob) over there really should work on making a standalone of their own.
Seriously. Not even near kidding.
Seriously. Not even near kidding.
I wouldn't really want AFR tracking.
In open loop all the times, you tell it exactly what AFR to burn at all times... and leave nothing to computing.
And to add more to the timing, DrJ said as well, part throttle and off boost timing makes worlds of difference.
There really isn't a need for 2 maps as far as "high" and "low" boost pressures are concerned. It's one map that should go from vacuum till 50psi. (opps, was the discussion for 2 maps this thread or Jakes thread.. hehe )
In open loop all the times, you tell it exactly what AFR to burn at all times... and leave nothing to computing.
And to add more to the timing, DrJ said as well, part throttle and off boost timing makes worlds of difference.
There really isn't a need for 2 maps as far as "high" and "low" boost pressures are concerned. It's one map that should go from vacuum till 50psi. (opps, was the discussion for 2 maps this thread or Jakes thread.. hehe )
We have a few of these at the shop for testing.. I'm wiring up in my Tacoma, I'll let ya know how it turns out. :icon_bigg
At least AEM is finally using USB! lol
At least AEM is finally using USB! lol
rakkasan said:
rakkasan said:
always way around that.
but that is why you make sure the piggy back chats with the ECU.