7mgte raising compression questions?

solpower

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
41
0
0
Albemarle, nc
im about to rebuild the good ol 7m and was wondering if it would be a good idea to bump the compression to say 9 to 1 with forged internals because from what i hear it helps make better power and spool the turbo quicker with higher compression. any thoughts?
 

gaboonviper85

Supramania Contributor
Jan 13, 2008
3,236
0
0
39
Northeast Philly
No....not going to explain why as it's so basic that you can research it yourself..

All I'll say is it's stupid to increase compression on a turbo car.
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
I did, to about 9.0. And I'm still making close to 500rwhp on pump gas. You probably won't see a noticable difference in power or spool-up, but you will have a little bit better off-boost response.
 

gaboonviper85

Supramania Contributor
Jan 13, 2008
3,236
0
0
39
Northeast Philly
MRSUPRA;1250392 said:
I did, to about 9.0. And I'm still making close to 500rwhp on pump gas. You probably won't see a noticable difference in power or spool-up, but you will have a little bit better off-boost response.

Man plays Russian rulett (sp) and lives...

Does that mean playing Russian rulett is a good idea?


It can be done sure...will it increase bottom end performance? Yeah a tad.....is it worth the overall problems associated with higher compression? No.
 

gaboonviper85

Supramania Contributor
Jan 13, 2008
3,236
0
0
39
Northeast Philly
GrimJack;1250414 said:
I suspect that it depends on your goals, as usual. If you want stock power levels with better turbo response, then, well... maybe.

If you want more power, like most, there are better ways.

^this
 

Mr. Y

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
363
0
0
40
80 miles away from Kremlin
Hey guys. Look at most aftermarket forget pistons specs. They're _rising_ CR. The only pistons _lowering_ CR a bit I've seen are probes.

PS: Gabon, don't tell me about russian rulette, please ;) I deal with it every moment cause I'm in Ru.
 

Neal

New Member
Jun 15, 2007
83
0
0
Melbourne
whats wrong with 8.5. If you want it to spool faster use a smaller turbo.

Use of thicker gaskit usually brings the compression dowm
 
Last edited:

quake

toyota tech
Apr 13, 2005
619
0
16
r.i.
It's not that big of a deal you will get more off boost power as my car feels like the average 6cyl then the boost hits. I means more power to drive the car with out boost and a bit better spool. What will make the big diffrence is how the car is tuned. Bumping it up to 9:1 means you have less of a margin for error in the tune. To date i put in 12k on a vpc afc and t-70 hard miles. With my new setup (same pistons) stand alone ecu i run 18-20psi on pump and have put on 15k hard miles from day one. Again it's in the tune
 

dumbo

Supramania Contributor
Jul 16, 2008
1,911
0
0
Albera, Too Far North
quake;1250672 said:
It's not that big of a deal you will get more off boost power as my car feels like the average 6cyl then the boost hits. I means more power to drive the car with out boost and a bit better spool. What will make the big diffrence is how the car is tuned. Bumping it up to 9:1 means you have less of a margin for error in the tune. To date i put in 12k on a vpc afc and t-70 hard miles. With my new setup (same pistons) stand alone ecu i run 18-20psi on pump and have put on 15k hard miles from day one. Again it's in the tune



Are you running 9:1? Or higher?
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
"Man plays Russian rulett (sp) and lives.."

What are you talking about?????? I'm tuned with an AEM. Can you say "timing control". I don't care what compression you run, with the stock ECU and the crazy high timing you get, you are at more risk for knock no matter what.

GO ahead and run 7.5 to 1 compression and see how your supra will feel like it has a 1.6liter in it.
 

solpower

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
41
0
0
Albemarle, nc
im just saying i want a little more out of boost power and i dont have plans of going past 15 or 16 psi and im only shooting for about 350 or so hp i just want a decently strong dd but i hvae to rebuild it anyway so i figured id help out the bottom a little
 

paradox616

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
472
0
0
Melbourne, Australia
Raising 0.5 CR isn't really worth the hassle especially on a 3L motor, for example on my v8(5L) i raised my CR from 8.5:1 to 9.5:1 when i fitted a higher lift/longer duration cam (given it was n/a) it only was worth 7rwkw

if anything you'll have to pull more timing on boost to avoid pre-ignition/detonation, sure you'll have a marginal increase off boost but you'll loose power from where it counts.
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
Another good post 2 ducks!

I tend to go the other way on Turbo motors and drop the comp a little to give a little more overhead in case of detonation as 1 bad rattle WILL ruin your entire day.

Any loss of power is more than made up for when you add boost, my motor has brilliant off boost response/drivability but as mentioned in the thread this is more due to the tune.

8.26:1 last time I measured it all but probably closer to 8.3:1 after the last build, my old 4v V8 by comparison was 6.5:1 and still drove nicely off boost.
 

quake

toyota tech
Apr 13, 2005
619
0
16
r.i.
solpower;1250942 said:
im just saying i want a little more out of boost power and i dont have plans of going past 15 or 16 psi and im only shooting for about 350 or so hp i just want a decently strong dd but i hvae to rebuild it anyway so i figured id help out the bottom a little

stick with stock compression for your goal
 

Supra90gr

Member
Feb 12, 2009
116
0
16
Connecticut
solpower;1252105 said:
also should i go for a bigger turbo because im bored with the ct26. this is the first supra so im just trying to get some advice from yall


The lower the compression the more boost you can run. Turbo cars are meant to have low compression. My friend with an sr20det bumped the compression up to get a better spool and what not and he ended up blowing the motor.
 

MRSUPRA

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
838
0
0
Maryland
Turbo cars are meant to have lower compression, not low compression. Rarely do you see newer turbo cars running lower that 9.0 compression. Cars that had 7.5-8.5:1 compression ratios are mainly from the 80's where lack of knock control and unsophisticated engine management where the norm. Cars are now made to not feel lik a slug before the turbo kicks in; Like my 91 Eclipse GS turbo which had a 7.8:1 compression.