2JZ S2k...
- Thread starter hottscennessey
- Start date
it looks a little tight, but i would rather see it in that RX-7, than a honda. either way, those two people are sick and twisted, and need to keep building cars
JonnyRedline said:
right... that must be it. I don't like the idea of putting a big heavy ass engine in a car that got it's notoriety for being a lightweight car great for the track.
It's a unique swap, I'm not denying that. I just don't like it...
that is soo frigen wicked.... that thing could pw3n all, that compressor surge is nothing, the turbo isn't even close to its map 9psi... and low surge like that is totally normal
OneJoeZee said:
That's funny, so you don't like the 2jz in a S2000, but you like it in a 240???
This is what you said about the 2jz in a 240
"wow... Very ince. any 1/4 passes yet?"
MKIII-DRIFTKING said:
you're right. I do like a 2j in a 240 better than an S2000. it's a cheap car thats lighter than a supra. powerful engine with less weight = nice drag times.
S2000s aren't cheap and if I was drag racing, it wouldnt be with an S2000...I can't see any other use of an S2000 other than a road course or autoX.
Clied said:
agreed, that didnt make any sense at all.
but i think its cool, its what honda should have done all along with that dam car, i know i work for a honda dealer and play with those things all day long.
my 2 cents.
-sean
I think its cool to have a 2J in a mkIV, a F22C in a S2000, and a turbo KA in a 240.
I have a very non-swap outlook :biglaugh:
Cool nonetheless.
-Justin
I have a very non-swap outlook :biglaugh:
Cool nonetheless.
-Justin