101MM Stroke 7MGE

prsrcokr

Motörhead
Apr 3, 2005
349
0
0
104
Richmond
Looks like a nice option Defiant. Wouldn't be PnP and I guess we'd have to swap for a GM knock sensor (wonder if you could calibrate to use the stock ones) Is the AEM 16x16 or does it have a higher resolution?

It does look like this has most of the features you'd need and then some.
Brian W
 

Alpinesupra

Cars never talk back
Apr 6, 2005
138
0
0
mckinney, tx
dude that is the most wicked 7mge i have ever seen, cant wait to see it run.
what tranny did or are you useing? the stock w58?
-sean
 

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
Alpinesupra said:
dude that is the most wicked 7mge i have ever seen, cant wait to see it run.
what tranny did or are you useing? the stock w58?
-sean
Hey thanks man, I will be using a R154 with a 4:56 ring gear.
 

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
Going back thru I notice some links don't work or the pics aren't showing. So I have added some thumbnail attachments. I love how the thumbnail attachments look. Here are some shots of the block clearanced for the stroke, also a few before the grinding :biglaugh:
 
Last edited:

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
The oil pump drive is not needed anymore. It is just an idler know, so I cut it :biglaugh: The other reason is the rods don't clear it with the stroke.
 
Last edited:

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
Allan: Ever thought of getting a shorter timing belt and get rid of it altogether?

I did this with a 2 litre Astron I built for the balance shafts just had to plug the oil holes.
(Looks brilliant so far can't wait to hear it run)
 

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
IJ. said:
Allan: Saw the thrusts there but will wait and see what I need for the new motor!

What sort of RPM limit are you looking at for the stroker?
I'm going to get them I think.. No more than stock, 7000 if it seems to be okay at that point. Also if I'm brave enough to take it there. Daryle says not to think about max rpm, it's more of a motor making max power/torque low/mid in the rpm band. It should be a blast to drive at the drags and SCCA events, and just evil on the street. It should make 240lbs tq @ 3000rpm, thats moving out really quick.
 
Last edited:

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
Alpinesupra said:
ok on the tranny i would have done the same, but why such high gearing?
unless i got it backwards?
-sean
The 5th gear is from a 88 V6 Pickup/4Runner with a R150 trans. It is a .565 ratio vs stock R154 ratio of .674. The final will be .63 5th vs a .75 stock.
4.30 x .75=3.225
4.56 x .63=2.873 should cruise nicely and the down shift too 4th just ugly!

3rd and 4th gear it should flat out run from just about anything out there. Should run mid 12s without the shot maybe better. The shot should knock close to a sec. off.
 

DEFIANT 7M

101MM stroke of INSANITY!
Mar 30, 2005
620
0
0
56
Nashville/Miami
Today I came across this in a Holley catalog.

Fuel Pumps:

Liters-----Gallons Per Hr.-----Pounds Per Hr.
190--------------50---------------301
220--------------58---------------345
255--------------67---------------404
378-------------100---------------600 (close to a MKIV pump)
567-------------150---------------900
756-------------200---------------1200

Typically @ WOT an engine needs 0.5lbs of fuel per hr. A gallon of gas weighs about 6lbs. An engine making 350hp will need about 175lbs (29 gallons) per hour.

350 x .5 = 175lbs of gas
175lbs/6lbs = 29 gallons per hour.

The stock MkIII fuel pump puts out 55-60 gallons per hour about 650hp or so. A MKIV TT pump puts out 90-95 gallons per hour about 1100hp. The Walbro really doesn't put out that much more than the stock MKIII pump. Any thoughts on this???