0-60

Jspec7m88

New Member
Dec 3, 2005
1,583
0
0
Nappy City
*From another thread*

bonus12 said:
i was kidding when i said auto's arent real cars, but c'mon, how far is that from the truth. there is nothing to driving an auto. as long as you can find the steering wheel and the two pedals, you know how to drive an auto, and you mnight as well be driving Geo Prizm or Ford Pony or whatever. Auto's are slower, too. Im sure you agree with all this

I usually never do, and I hate doing it, and I don't mean to pick on ONLY you, because there are other people out there that believe what you do...., but words cannot explain how irritated I am by this post. I could say a lot of things, but I'll keep my mouth shut.


:nono:
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
Some of the new robot/servo shifted and clutch'd transmissions are the fastest in the world. (Thus the reason they use them in F1 and many other forms of motorsports.)

Traditional "automatics" that use a tourqe converter are going to become rare as this technology advances, or at the very least, will become hybridized to fit into the latest designs.

Look at the Veyon to see the future of transmision design. (Never really is out of gear, just the milliseconds between engaging the two clutches and dual racks of gears.)

No loss of boost pressure, no loss of power with slipping tourqe converters, or the heat they produce and then you lose when cooling the fluid. (All heat is energy loss if you think of it that way.)
 

Insidious Surmiser

Formerly 89jdm7m
May 12, 2006
2,172
0
0
Oceanfront
Adjuster said:
Some of the new robot/servo shifted and clutch'd transmissions are the fastest in the world. (Thus the reason they use them in F1 and many other forms of motorsports.)

Traditional "automatics" that use a tourqe converter are going to become rare as this technology advances, or at the very least, will become hybridized to fit into the latest designs.

Look at the Veyon to see the future of transmision design. (Never really is out of gear, just the milliseconds between engaging the two clutches and dual racks of gears.)

No loss of boost pressure, no loss of power with slipping tourqe converters, or the heat they produce and then you lose when cooling the fluid. (All heat is energy loss if you think of it that way.)
just wanted to add that there is NO room in a f1 car for a normal shifter, maybee not a clutch either
 

Ma70.Ent

Supramania Contributor
Feb 26, 2006
1,871
1
0
NJ
Snotcycle said:
you can also hold your hand on your aftermarket shifter while you roll down the strip blasting Lil Jon out of your 15" sub and watch all the girls stare at your spinning rims and fake boost gauge because you got an NA...

Cause that has a lot to do with what I said?
 

Insidious Surmiser

Formerly 89jdm7m
May 12, 2006
2,172
0
0
Oceanfront
Snotcycle said:
you can also hold your hand on your aftermarket shifter while you roll down the strip blasting Lil Jon out of your 15" sub and watch all the girls stare at your spinning rims and fake boost gauge because you got an NA...
AHEM

HIGHLY uncalled for :3d_frown:
 

Adjuster

Supramania Contributor
There is no room? The shifter paddles are generally mounted to the steering yoke now. Most steering wheels have been replaced by yokes so they can also mount the critical data screens and lamps up where the top of a steering wheel would reside....

Besides, not much need to turn the yoke very far on the F1 cars, so the hands on the yoke works out very well.

Back on subject, they have a clutch, or even clutches, but they are actuated by the computer and robotics that also shift the transmission. The cool part is with an electric throttle, and the right programing, the engine blips the throttle between shifts, and matches engine rpm to transmission rack rpm, so no need to double clutch, the computer does it all for you. Very easy on the gears on acleration and decleration.
 

Snotcycle

New Member
Jul 16, 2006
128
0
0
Palo Alto, CA
Adjuster said:
Back on subject, they have a clutch, or even clutches, but they are actuated by the computer and robotics that also shift the transmission. The cool part is with an electric throttle, and the right programing, the engine blips the throttle between shifts, and matches engine rpm to transmission rack rpm, so no need to double clutch, the computer does it all for you. Very easy on the gears on acleration and decleration.

except for the fact that they are pushing 800+hp through the transmission :biglaugh:
89jdm7m said:
HIGHLY uncalled for :3d_frown:
sorry?
I see way too many riced out cars, 99% of which are auto versions of something that could've been cool. Your riceboy counterparts have given automatics a bad name, if you can show me otherwise then do so.

On the topic of losing boost between shifts, i have the SOGI short shift done and with the stock recirc-BOV system i can spool very quick as:
A) by the time i'm in the next gear and back on the gas, not all the boost has leaked out
B) the boost leaking out is feeding the cold side of the turbo to keep it spooled

So it would seem the only lag is created by having to re-pressurize the intake piping
 
Last edited:

Ma70.Ent

Supramania Contributor
Feb 26, 2006
1,871
1
0
NJ
Snotcycle said:
except for the fact that they are pushing 800+hp through the transmission :biglaugh:

sorry?
I see way too many riced out cars, 99% of which are auto versions of something that could've been cool. Your riceboy counterparts have given automatics a bad name, if you can show me otherwise then do so.

On the topic of losing boost between shifts, i have the SOGI short shift done and with the stock recirc-BOV system i can spool very quick as:
A) by the time i'm in the next gear and back on the gas, not all the boost has leaked out
B) the boost leaking out is feeding the cold side of the turbo to keep it spooled

So it would seem the only lag is created by having to re-pressurize the intake piping
What makes you think our/my car is riced out? My car is pretty much stock and I have no plans to rice it out.
 

MDCmotorsports

Offical SM Expert: Turbochargers
SM Expert
Mar 31, 2005
4,194
2
38
43
Indy 500
www.MDCmotorsports.com
Guys:

-Autos are typically faster in the 1/4 mile due to the fact that the auto provides continuous torque output with continuous load. Remember cars don't boost unless they have load.

-The future of Automatics aren't really automatic at all. Besides from not having a clutch, the buck stops there. The future is a torque converter based system. For instance, you press on the gas to make the engine accellerate @ 3500rpm. The engine will stay in this optimal accelleration rpm point all the way to 70mph or more.

-F1 cars do have clutches. They are controlled - traction wise by the computer, especially on launches. The driver is simply there to push the buttons and be a rocket pilot through the corners (which by no means is easy). They do shift. They do have gear packs. They are rated at close to 1000hp @ 18,500+rpms.
 

foreverpsycotic

Back in the game!
Jul 16, 2006
3,171
12
38
37
ATL
its kinda funny how a question on 0-60 times and HP turned into a auto vs manual argument. does it honestly matter what other people drive? will you loose sleep if a person has a(n) xx tranny? let people drive what they will and how they want to(as long as they dont endanger ppl on the road). keep the opinion questions to the opinion threads, and the fact questions to the fact threads.
 

daledoe

KILL U
Nov 18, 2005
1,467
0
0
MAINE
I think it turned into the "auto vs manual" argument because thats a big fackter in 0-60 time!!!
 
N

NDBoost

Guest
ValgeKotkas said:
no not stock,
stock turbo 3" turbo back mandrel bent exh. 8-10lbs of boost and an apexi intake. I was Auto btw.
 

suprarich

Guest
Nov 9, 2005
2,187
0
0
ohio
bonus12 said:
now why does an auto beat a manual, what with a torque converter and all?

i dont buy this.

I have one of each, with the same size turbo, the auto will beat the manual, all other things being equal.
 

suprahero

naughty by nature
Staff member
Aug 26, 2005
14,971
0
36
54
Roll Tide
suprarich said:
I have one of each, with the same size turbo, the auto will beat the manual, all other things being equal.

I have to agree. I had an automatic, and did the five speed swap two months ago. My best in my auto was 8.73 in an 1/8 and my best so far is 9.17 with the five speed. My trap speed is faster with the manual, but I spin alot more. I hardly ever spun with the auto. Sorry for the off topic, but this seems to be the topic now.

I haven't timed my 0-60 yet because my speedometer is off a little right now. When mine saids 60, I'm actually doing 71mph. If I had to put a time on 0-60 I would say.............pretty quick..............;)