WTF? Edmunds pricing
- Thread starter jugodegolf
- Start date
Edmunds tends to low-ball with their TMV program. For a realistic value, pull from:
http://www.kbb.com
http://www.edmunds.com
http://www.nadaguides.com/
Average the value across the highest two.
Private party, good condition example:
1990 Turbo, Gunmetal, 225K miles|
NADA:|$3,600
KBB:|$2,815
Edmunds:|$964
Average of high two:|$3207.50
Edmunds, as you can see above is way off from the other two.
http://www.kbb.com
http://www.edmunds.com
http://www.nadaguides.com/
Average the value across the highest two.
Private party, good condition example:
NADA:|$3,600
KBB:|$2,815
Edmunds:|$964
Average of high two:|$3207.50
Edmunds, as you can see above is way off from the other two.
NADA clean retail on my 97,000 mile 92 is $5675. It gives an $850 mileage upgrade in that.
On Edmunds, I get a $3 upgrade for my car being Red!
And, a search of 92's for sale at "any distance", there are currently no 92's for sale in the country by dealer or individual. Search was done by Edmunds/Autotrader
On Edmunds, I get a $3 upgrade for my car being Red!
And, a search of 92's for sale at "any distance", there are currently no 92's for sale in the country by dealer or individual. Search was done by Edmunds/Autotrader
Last edited:
k?
Not to mention that anything over 20 years isn't in their database as they're a "collector's" car and the value will follow that. Seeing as how the 92 is the rarest of MKIII's the value should be higher, but it isn't.
IIRC. this isn't in referance to selling rather it is about replacing a totaled car. Jugodegolf and his son were in a rather nasty accident this summer. I might be wrong, it might have been his 89.
I thought that might be why, but those values are shit considering you can't buy a 92 in the condition his was in for that price, period.
Have to look at for-sale ads and find true market value, the rest is speculation based on milage, price, and depreciation it seems.
Have to look at for-sale ads and find true market value, the rest is speculation based on milage, price, and depreciation it seems.
ForcedTorque;1457064 said:
They really dont care if its a 92 though, its 1 year newer then a 91 and 2 years newer then a 90 in their eyes. You might be able to fight with the value on the 92 because they're the only ones with the black leather (if you have it of course).
Why look on online pricing anyways? Unless trying to get a loan or trying to fight with an insurance company over the value of the car. The pricing is never accurate, though I'm surprised the value is close on my mkiv (compared to a few years ago when they listed them like 7k).
When my 89 accord got toatlled in 97. this is the same bullshit they tried to hit us with. We went out and got every newspaper with in 100 miles of our house and every internet auto sale site for fair market value. we ended up with 5000 grand.
Wow I checked Edmunds, KBB, and Nada.. seems like they think mine with 66k miles on it is worth about 5k. For that kinda money...I think I'll keep it. I know its worth way more to the right person.
George wrecked his '89, not his '92. I don't know why he's checking on pricing unless it's just for comparrison or just so he knows what its book value is. I know he's been negotiating with the insurance company for a while over the value of his '89. Just like most insurance companies, they're trying to stick it to him with no lube.
The 1992 is not really worth more in my opinion.
There was only a couple minor variables, Exterior/Interior colors speaker pods sun roof.
The only way your car would be rare as a supra for a 1992 is if it came with options that were only released for that years such as shadow grey interior large speaker pods sub woofer sun roof, then it would be worth the most.
Just like all the other supras though it had a lot of the same flaws head gasket blows still.
R154 thrust washer issues the exception being the JZA70 R
Its the heaviest supra of all the years with the 1986.5 being the lightest.
I wouldnt pick a supra based on year being its value itself, but condition & actual rarity such as TURBO A/GROUP A JZA70 [R] would be the supras to go for!.
There was only a couple minor variables, Exterior/Interior colors speaker pods sun roof.
The only way your car would be rare as a supra for a 1992 is if it came with options that were only released for that years such as shadow grey interior large speaker pods sub woofer sun roof, then it would be worth the most.
Just like all the other supras though it had a lot of the same flaws head gasket blows still.
R154 thrust washer issues the exception being the JZA70 R
Its the heaviest supra of all the years with the 1986.5 being the lightest.
I wouldnt pick a supra based on year being its value itself, but condition & actual rarity such as TURBO A/GROUP A JZA70 [R] would be the supras to go for!.