Word.

Jun 6, 2006
2,488
12
38
42
Amerika
www.dreamertheresa.com
sm_photo_missing.jpg
 

Wills7MGTE

( . )( . )'s RULE!!!!
May 12, 2006
1,077
0
0
38
Jackson, MO
www.myspace.com
I hate the fu#@ers whpo take every GD family member they got to the grocery store and none of them are worth a damn, misbehaving a stuff, we need a law like china you get 2 kids and thats it anymore come your in da troubles.
 

91T breezen'

ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
Apr 4, 2005
1,149
0
0
NOYFB!
Just looks to be a good ole' Mormon family!:icon_razz Way to many kids for my tastes,:aigo: but they are usually very nice people. And, I guarantee you they have plenty of money!
 

Tanya

Supramania Contributor
Aug 15, 2005
1,851
1
0
43
Naples, FL
That picture is great.

Personally, I think there should be more emphasis on tubal litigation for younger people. The law was (or is) in Florida that you had to be over 21 and/or have more than 3 children to be qualified for a tubal litigation. But even if you are over 21, most docs would still rather you have 3 kids before performing the procedure, they think you're too young, at 18 or 21, to decide whether or not you want children in the future.

I know damn sure that if I could have had a TL at 18, I would have done it. I think it's BS that a women's choice is overlooked in this matter, but whatever.
Stupid hos will go on producing infants and tossing them in dumpsters because that's the way the world works.

/rant
 

Supracentral

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
10,542
10
36
Tanya,

I don't actually believe it's law. In most places it's "accepted practice" and/or "medical ethics" that gets in the way.

Since TL is reversible these days, maybe they'll lighten up on it a bit.
 

mkiiSupraMan18

Needs a new username...
Apr 1, 2005
2,161
0
0
United States
^ What he said...

Why go in and risk screwing up a lot of stuff just because someone refuses to practice safe sex. Kinda silly IMO

Why not go for the JDM tyte hysterectomy? :icon_conf
 

Tanya

Supramania Contributor
Aug 15, 2005
1,851
1
0
43
Naples, FL
Supracentral said:
Tanya,

I don't actually believe it's law. In most places it's "accepted practice" and/or "medical ethics" that gets in the way.

Since TL is reversible these days, maybe they'll lighten up on it a bit.

yeah, I believe it's around $10,000+ to reverse it if I'm not mistaken.



People aren't going to practice safe sex if they don't want to. People, by nature, are retards that way. I would just offer up alternatives, such as tubal litigation. Guys are less willing to get a vasectomy for that eternal fear of sciccors going next to their balls, lol. When I do believe it's a lot safer to have a vasectomy than a TL.

I don't have a real answer for these issues, just half assed comments I guess. I had a tubal litigation myself, and I do not regret it. No issues during the surgery, very minimal pain afterwards.
 

mkiiSupraMan18

Needs a new username...
Apr 1, 2005
2,161
0
0
United States
I'd get the big snip before I made my wife get her tubes tied. He'll I'd get one now and then have it reveresed when we wanted kids if I could afford that route.
 
Jun 6, 2006
2,488
12
38
42
Amerika
www.dreamertheresa.com
Supracentral said:
Tanya,

I don't actually believe it's law. In most places it's "accepted practice" and/or "medical ethics" that gets in the way.

Since TL is reversible these days, maybe they'll lighten up on it a bit.



No, not really. I've been begging my doctor for a tubal for six years.