suprahabsfan;999434 said:
other companies are doing it why can't we?
Sorry to sound like an ass, but we are not Toyota, unless you work in their buisiness development/RandD center.
The 'Z' guys, skyline guys, S13 guys probably didn't have alot of input on putting the GTR on the market, and I'd presume not many of them can afford to own one. There will likely be no such thing as a Ricer Nissan GTR.
The Ford Mustang comes with a V6 for a reason.
You can buy a 260hp FF neon for around 33grand or so, and many other "sporty" cars for mere pennies, almost all of which are front wheel drive. Everyone I've talked to that knows diddly squat about cars is dead set on getting a front wheel drive and will hear nothing different. It's what the market wants... economy, gas milage, and a bit of fun on the side.
Those are not true sports cars, they're just 'sporty' family cars and econoboxes, and I'll hear nothing different. Front wheel drive was designed for one purpose: Economy. Any other use of it is just an engineering excercise. Wanna go fast? RWD. Want traction? AWD/4WD. FF layout cars are cheaper to design, cheaper to build, cheaper to buy.
There currently is little money to be made by RnDing a true rear drive front engine sports car from Toyota in the 25-35k market right now. The truth of the matter is that to beat an SRT-4 with a rear wheel drive car will cost alot more than $35000 to roll out of the factory.
The 50-70k market is where the real performance sits... and not many people are spending that much money to buy that kind of car. They want economy, luxury, ect. Going too fast around corners is not high on the list of the wants of 85% of new buyers.