Well I didn't expect it to be so complicated, but my first intent and interest was for the MKlll however, the earlier model debates are entertaining.
Poodles;1765531 said:...and yet having the same attitude that MKIV owners have about MKIII's not being "real" supras is asinine.
Anyway, carry on with your bickering, gives me something to do later :rofl:
JDMMA70;1765546 said:Whatever you want to call it, im just going by what Toyota designated the car.
JDMMA70;1765546 said:If Toyota decided to call the MK3 a CelicaSupra thats what itd be and the MK4 would be the only real Supra. However since Toyota designated the MK3 as "Supra" thats what its going to be.
JDMMA70;1765546 said:You dont have to be a genius to figure that out. However since you seem to enjoy arguing im just going to stop here since you dont like to be wrong as demonstrated by your actions in flashchat.
DreamerTheresa;1765507 said:
Jeff Lange;1765660 said:Supra was only a grade level of the Celica, like ST, GT and GT-S, it wasn't an actual model in it's own right until 1986.
So no, there was no Supra models before 1986. The 15th Anniversay Edition wasn't even a factory thing. Toyota USA just stuck those stickers on when the car got here from Japan.
You can argue it both ways pretty agressively, I mean in spirit (and due to many similarities and lineage), I do consider the MK1/2 to be Supras. That being said, it really was just an export name for the Celica XX grade level.
I'll also mention that car companies tend to take advantage of the grey areas - I wouldn't be in the least surprised to see Toyota putting, say, 50th anniversary editions out in widely separated time spans to boost sales.Jeff Lange;1765660 said:Supra was only a grade level of the Celica, like ST, GT and GT-S, it wasn't an actual model in it's own right until 1986.
So no, there was no Supra models before 1986. The 15th Anniversay Edition wasn't even a factory thing. Toyota USA just stuck those stickers on when the car got here from Japan.
You can argue it both ways pretty agressively, I mean in spirit (and due to many similarities and lineage), I do consider the MK1/2 to be Supras. That being said, it really was just an export name for the Celica XX grade level.
As for Firebirds, Trans-Ams and Camaros: Trans-Am is not the model name of a car, it is a grade level on the Firebird. The model names are only Firebird and Camaro.
Jeff
not trying to bust your balls just saying.te72;1766318 said:Oh, and to answer the question that was asked, the title on my 84 says "Supra", but that will likely vary state to state and country to country... Ever seen a 2nd or 3rd gen Celica up close? I've owned a 2nd gen AND a Mk1, and while they are very similar, there is enough difference to make it it's own model... same with the 3rd gen Celica/Mk2.
JDMMA70;1766491 said:not trying to bust your balls just saying.