Alright I have a dual VVT-i 2jz-gte from a 99 mk4 that I want to swap into an mk3. I've been looking around on craigslist and what not and I've found a few that I'm interested in. I just thought I'd ask for some advice on what I should look for in an mk3 to make the swap go as smoothly as possible as far as having to modify the least amount of things on the car.
What kind of mk3 should I get?
- Thread starter skanimal
- Start date
Everything you need to know can be found on this page here in the "Stickies".
Good luck.
http://www.supramania.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30
Good luck.
http://www.supramania.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=30
Well I've heard the VVTI 2jz is a pain to swap as well as tune or modify, the extra 10hp stock to me isnt worth the extra dough to put it in and ultimately it will cause problems later if you wanna do cams and stuff.
Wills7MGTE;1252067 said:
I think it'd be worth it.
as for the car. Find the cleanest one possible to start out with. Dont bother with a 'project' car, they're just a pain in the ass and almost as expensive in the end.
Wills7MGTE;1252067 said:
I have done plenty of VVTi cars and the power difference is not much, but having full torque by 2300 RPM sounds much better to me. Cams is not an issue and tuning is as easy as any other VVT engine. VVTi setup right can spool big turbos faster then any non VVTi 2jz with head work. I've heard so much bad stuff about VVTi that is funny! HKS makes a full lineup of cam setups for it and cam controllers. All new versions of the Fcon V pro can control the VVTi with the help of Valcon pro. US tuning is just starting to get on to it wile the Japanese have been making power on it for years!
BTW VVTi rods on the 2jzgte are the same as non VVTi, nothing is weaker about that engine internally.
As far as a good mk3 to get, low miles, unmolested and 90 to 92 year. Targa is best, hartop is to soft frame wise and the cars are not getting any newer.
Last I checked the targa were the ones with structual rigidity problems.
Get a turbo or a sprt na modfel to benefit from staring having a LSD
Get a turbo or a sprt na modfel to benefit from staring having a LSD
He is most likely refering to the fact that targas do have extra bracing ....but its not enough the hard top is still more rigid
:biglaugh:well I just got my new 89 mk3. It is a targa top (not because I thought it would more structurally rigid but because it's just nice to have) and I've decided to keep the 7m in it for a while. There'll be plenty of time to tear it apart later haha :biglaugh:
Yeah, i would just run the 7m. The hardtop is lighter but the targas looks cool. Im really pondering a swap after breaking 2 7m's.
skanimal;1253361 said:
You don't say if your new MK3 is a turbo or not, but I would think a turbo model would be better suited for a turbo swap.
soapra;1253379 said:
From my experience the targas have more chassis flex. I had an 87 turbo hard top, and I just got an 88 NA targa. With the targa top out I can feel the difference in handling, but my 87 turbo had swaybars/shocks/springs and my 88 is stock suspension, so that may make my opinion slightly biased :icon_bigg
I would go with a NA/auto/HT in the best condition I could find, pre 89 if at all possible (with a 89+ taillight swap). Then I would send the harnesses to Dr. Tweak for him to make it PnP, get some BIC mounts, megan coilovers and a full exhaust (twins back). Tune it with an AFC-NEO (IIRC they can control the vvti). Swap the motor in, switching the tailhousing on the auto to the MKIII a340 one if at all possible, and end up with a DAMN fast stock twin car. I personally would leave it BPU with cams, 3->4" dp and a 4" catback, AFC, 550-620cc injectors, denso pump and a larger stall.
I haven't thought about this at all :sarcasm:
I haven't thought about this at all :sarcasm: