What is a better setup for engine management?

Ma70.Ent

Supramania Contributor
Feb 26, 2006
1,871
1
0
NJ
SAFC vs VPC+GCC+FCON

Which do you feel is better? What are the advantages/disadvantages of each? Do not factor in cost. :D
 

iceberg319

vvti, what?
Apr 6, 2005
328
0
0
NJ
www.cardomain.com
lets say he had all them in possession. please dont say sell them and get maft pro


as for the fcon, whenever i search the only response i get is it makes your car run really rich. are there any other comments other than that? could someone get a decent tune(11.5-12 afr) hooking it up to a gcc?
 

Supracentral

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
10,542
10
36
I would do VPC & SAFC and sell the other alphabet soup junk.

My real answer is sell all of that and get a maft-pro. :p
 

Ma70.Ent

Supramania Contributor
Feb 26, 2006
1,871
1
0
NJ
I wish I had more info on the setups that were actually discussed in the topic....lol.
 

QWIKSTRIKE

475rwhp459torq an climbin
Apr 3, 2005
1,172
0
36
63
Some where out there
www.cardomain.com
SAFC vs VPC+GCC+FCON

Which do you feel is better? What are the advantages/disadvantages of each? Do not factor in cost.



Over 450 rwhp go standalone and get a good tune. Drop the stock ECU, and piggy back if cost is not a factor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ma70.Ent

Supramania Contributor
Feb 26, 2006
1,871
1
0
NJ
Haha I meant do not factor the cost for the SAFC setup or the HKS parts, but I guess the way to go is MAFT-Pro!