....well now

Facime

Leather work expert
Jun 1, 2006
2,716
0
0
60
Corvallis OR
CtSupra said:
no z-car is IL, iirc.

Well thats not really true.

The 240, 260 and 280Z's were I6. The 300Z went 3.0v6. I had the anniversary turbo and I liked it alot...when it ran right...prone to fuel problems. But with the tops out and dropped down on a nice set of wheels...it was a pussy magnet.

Of course, that was back in the 90's :biglaugh:
 

PROJECT N00b

XBL: Mkiii DriFt3r
May 22, 2005
1,660
0
0
35
honolulu, california
www.myspace.com
Engines

The first two generations (240Z/260Z/280Z and 280ZX) of Z-car were powered by a Straight-6, (part of the L-series of Nissan engines, which powered most of their vehicles until the early 1980s) with a displacement of 2.4 L in the first incarnation, and increasing to 2.6 L and 2.8 L in the 260Z, and the 280Z and ZX, respectively.

The second generation, the 280ZX, introduced in 1979 was a complete re-design, retaining only the L28 engine and other driveline components. A turbo option was introduced, bringing performance surpassing that of the original 240z.

The third generation, the 300ZX, switched to a 3.0 L V6. Two generations of 300ZX ended in 1996 in the US{in most states, anyway} and the Z32 model canceled in Japan in 1997{Some cars were still exported there, though}. The cost of production was rising too fast for Japanese and most U.S. customers, so it was limited to those states in which could be sold. Even a major design change in 1998 couldn't save it, and production finally ended in 2001.

In the 2003 model year, Nissan reentered the US sports-car market with the 350Z, powered by a 3.5 L V6, and styled in an attempt to create a more modern interpretation of the 240Z's lines. It had a new 6-speed manual gearbox, and is capable of over 155 mph.
 

materchan

New Member
Mar 31, 2006
4
0
0
bay area
z's ended being L6 with the 280zx, the simplest damn most rock solid engine ever. then in 84 when they went to the 300zx they went to the vg30e a sohc v6. then when the second gen 300zx went to the vg30de which is a dohc v6.

you got yourself a damn good car for the price.


edit: (damn beat to the punch)
 

wingman

sucka got blammed!
Sep 11, 2005
427
0
0
35
Phoenix, AZ
MDCmotorsports said:
Um wouldn't have touched it with a ten foot pole.

Ive had 2 of those v6 turbos in my shop, and I couldn't get either to make any power.


it's not going to be modded, period. If I wanted power I'd have already had a VG30DE or DETT swap lined out. The supra is the "go balls out fast with no destination" car, while this is the "go kinda fast around town" car.

this car is simply to retire my lancer...i hate paying $500 a month for a car I hate to drive....i was looking at N/A's, but when the turbo came up I just had to jump on it.

far as the fuel system, I'll look into aftermarket stuff in case the stock one craps the bed.
 

wingman

sucka got blammed!
Sep 11, 2005
427
0
0
35
Phoenix, AZ
theWeezL said:
to be honest I think you got a great deal on a nice looking car...I would have taken it.


considering i was looking at a white '86 with 127K on the ticker for $3200 I think I got a great deal. The white one wasn't even turbo either, but it was mint...