Saleen S7 Twin turbo is my all time dream car its exclusive, fast and I could just stare at it all day
weekly car debate thread.
- Thread starter 87mk111
- Start date
ok new week and i got a new debate for y'all. Dodge Neon SRT-4 and the Chevy cobalt SS. I'm going with the SS because I'm more of a chevy guy and I think it looks better lol.
Last edited:
I assume you mean Cobalt SS.
As you could get a non-supercharged (or later, turbocharged) SS and it had that TERRIBLE ricer wing, I'm gonna say Neon wins this one.
Not a fan of either one really. The Neon can look pretty good, but it's still a stupid Neon...
As you could get a non-supercharged (or later, turbocharged) SS and it had that TERRIBLE ricer wing, I'm gonna say Neon wins this one.
Not a fan of either one really. The Neon can look pretty good, but it's still a stupid Neon...
Hmm... good comparison, for the class. I'm sure they're natural rivals to some. Personally, I almost bought an SRT4 before getting my first Supra. Then I thought about what I could do to a Supra with 20k, and went the route I went, and am a much happier (and faster) man for it.
If I had to choose, I think I'd go with the Dodge for the potential (seen some quick cars built), but the Chevy for everything else. Cobalts are pretty decent cars for what they are, and I'm sure the turbo is a good bit of fun to drive...
If I had to choose, I think I'd go with the Dodge for the potential (seen some quick cars built), but the Chevy for everything else. Cobalts are pretty decent cars for what they are, and I'm sure the turbo is a good bit of fun to drive...
For me the E-type was beautiful, the Benz was not only beautiful but revolutionary.
---------- Post added at 07:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:07 AM ----------
Important to remember the 300sl debuted in 1954, the jaguar in 1961 so when comparing specs keep that in mind.
---------- Post added at 07:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:07 AM ----------
Important to remember the 300sl debuted in 1954, the jaguar in 1961 so when comparing specs keep that in mind.
te72;1754308 said:
oooooooooo nice one, e type for sure. woulda updated this monday, but work had been crazy
Oh man... That's a tough one.
E-type is iconic and at it's time, DESTROYED all the other equivelent cars that were much more expensive than it. But of course, Lucas electronics...
The Merc is the exact opposite being rediculously expensive in it's day and to buy now, but it was the fastest car on the road at the time.
If it was my money, I'd buy the E-type just because it's prettier :rofl:
E-type is iconic and at it's time, DESTROYED all the other equivelent cars that were much more expensive than it. But of course, Lucas electronics...
The Merc is the exact opposite being rediculously expensive in it's day and to buy now, but it was the fastest car on the road at the time.
If it was my money, I'd buy the E-type just because it's prettier :rofl:
new week, new debate. this week, honda s2000 vs. bmw z3/z4. My pick is the Honda. I think it looks and sounds better, plus they are a little cheaper too.
those z4m are pretty fast buddys kept up with me till 140mph then i started to pull on him
but i think the s2k looks better and i would also probably put 2j in it
but i think the s2k looks better and i would also probably put 2j in it
Even when it's not an option, Miata is the answer :rofl:
BMW Z3, no. BMW Z4, yes. BMW Z4 M, YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.
BMW Z3, no. BMW Z4, yes. BMW Z4 M, YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.
Z4 M will beat the snot out of an S2000. Hell, a normal Z4 probably would too. Z3, definately not.
Just for the sheer stupidity of a 9k redline, the S2K in my book. Plus, Honda subframes aren't famous for breaking (looking at you, Z3...).
Not familiar with this Z4M you speak of... it have the S54 from last generation's M3? If so... damn.
Not familiar with this Z4M you speak of... it have the S54 from last generation's M3? If so... damn.
Z3 is little better than an overpriced Miata. Seriously.
Z4 on the other hand looks awesome, and the M version has 333HP out of a 3.2 I6 with a redline of 8K
S2000 probably is built better and will be cheaper to maintain (of course I'm pointing out the obvious), but they're both about the same price used (M edition is more expensive, obviously).
Z4 on the other hand looks awesome, and the M version has 333HP out of a 3.2 I6 with a redline of 8K
S2000 probably is built better and will be cheaper to maintain (of course I'm pointing out the obvious), but they're both about the same price used (M edition is more expensive, obviously).