strut bar myths

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
I am surprised at how this worthless contraption has everyone thinking it actually does SOMETHING to improve suspension. This is only specific to the STB that is tied between the tower and not the one that connects the frame and the towers in a triangle.


Myth #1: STB keep the suspension geometery the same.
Fact: STB are no better than a piece of rope tied between both strut tower. The up and down flexing can not be controlled by a floating arm. The side to side flexing is taken care off by lateral gravity and if that lateral flexing is happening. The STB is only going to help induce a bigger tracking problem.

Myth #2: But the factory installed one so the engineers know what they are doing.
Fact: Just like any other product. The mind is easily tricked into thinking what is good or not.

this is just the begining..
OVERTHROW floating STB!

edit: add more as I know there are more myths about STB out there!
 

figgie

Supramania Contributor
Mar 30, 2005
5,225
16
38
50
Twin Cities, Minnesot-ah
BorHor;997271 said:
Werd. Basically useless in a supra. Doesn't it help in some other cars though??


perhaps in the non macpherson strut type cars. But without bracing to the frame. I fail to see how exactly it would "help" :) I keep hearing that it keeps camber the same. 3200 lbs of car flying around a corner and that little "brace" helps......
 

williamb82

Member
Apr 24, 2005
906
4
18
42
Tampa, Fl.
how are they worthless? i have drivn a mk3 with and without one and it made a very noticable diff around corners wehn installed. also made a HUGE diff when i installed one on my mk2.
 

williamb82

Member
Apr 24, 2005
906
4
18
42
Tampa, Fl.
no po'ed at that. what pisses me off is you can get a strut brace for like $20 for the mk3 but the only good one for the mk2 is like $200 and only available in group buys on occasion. thats what sucks. lol. lukily i have 2 of them now so im set. and 2 sets of the addco swaybars as well etc.. both my black mk2's will handle very well when done.
 

turbogate

Life is Boost
May 18, 2005
425
0
16
South, FL
See this short thread where 2 well respected Supra Guru's (Larry-A and IJ) almost went at it:biglaugh:. They had different opinions about Strut bars. Larry-A did make a good point POST 25, but he never got around to proving it or didn't care to. But he did explain why he thought that strut bars did make a difference to a certain extent. (I'll hide my signature in this thread so you guys don't see my strut bar, LOL)

http://www.supramania.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43428&page=2&highlight=suspension

EDIT IJ just posted before me:icon_bigg
 

BorHor

2JZ-GZE
Jan 10, 2006
6,181
1
38
35
San Jose, CA
IJ.;997293 said:
LOL been saying this since day 1 but people still swear by their "placebo bars" ;)

haha. I want a TRD one because it looks bad ass and that is about it. Yes I am a ricer. :biglaugh:
 

speed

Gone. Email me.
May 27, 2006
1,045
0
0
not here
www.timduganphotography.com
it all depends on what sort of suspension the car has. our cars have lower and UPPER a-arms, the uppers are where the force of the suspension is impacting the chassis. if theres any bracing that would be benificial on our cars, it would be where the uppers meet the chassis. But good luck making something to fit.


If the car has MacPherson struts- IE a lower control arm, and then the shock & spring assembly as one going to the unibody, THAT point is where the force of the suspension is being absorbed. in THAT case, a strut bar does do something, as the unibody at the tower mounting points CAN flex a little. Macphersons are structurally part of the suspension.


In our cars, we have subframes. The front subframe houses both upper and lower control arms, and the rear subframe has both upper and lower control arms. (edit.. er trailing arms on the rear. Same principle applies though) The body mounts are just to line up the spring and dampers. bracing those points won't do diddly. Now, bracing those points to the floor/firewall will stiffen the BODY, but not the suspension. Our springs and shocks are NOT structural bits.


Edit: Here's math:
http://e30m3performance.com/myths/Strutbar_Theory/strut_bar_theory.htm Keep in mind, the suspension in those diagrams has lower control arms, and ONE upper mount, this case the macpherson strut. Our cars have lower and UPPERs, the UPPER is where the force is placed.
 
Last edited:

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
IwantMKIII;997295 said:
i would like to see some numbers with drawings proving these "myths" true or false. Until then i remain neutral.
It's just basic geometry.

Take a cardboard box with the ends open and flex it it's a big wobbly mess even though it's got 4 sides (this roughly replicates the front subframe/shock towers and Placebo Bar)

If you triangulate the corners it'll become more ridgid and resist the flexing.
 

willtotheumm

I Bleed TRD
Apr 11, 2008
75
0
0
Orcutt, CA
www.myspace.com
now I feel the 80 bucks I just spent on tower bars for my car is useless.

Anyone wanna buy brand-new front and rear bars? LOL

Nah i'll still install them. Might as well put them on. I dont think a few pounds will make a difference with 800hp (my Supra is gonna have this minimum by this time next year). :D
 

sneakypete

Regular Member
Jul 18, 2007
1,129
0
0
Central NJ
ive never had one before... and im assuming your talking about both the front and the rear STB?
also how about lower frame braces? are they any good? and im pretty sure traction bars have proven results.
im looking to upgrade my suspension a bit and need to solid advice
thanks
-pete
 

IJ.

Grumpy Old Man
Mar 30, 2005
38,728
0
0
62
I come from a land down under
Take a look how they did the race cars ;)
(not a placebo bar in sight)

Group%20A%20Engine%20Bay%206.jpg
 

tlo86

Ninja Editor 'Since 05'
Jul 24, 2005
3,914
0
0
38
Colorado
but they did weld a bar from the strut tower to the firewall, unless thats part of the rollcage?

i took mine off and didnt notice any difference *shrug*